9-2651454-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 2P and 16B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1
The ENST00000382100.8(VLDLR):c.2291C>T(p.Thr764Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000737 in 1,613,896 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. T764T) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000382100.8 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VLDLR | NM_003383.5 | c.2291C>T | p.Thr764Met | missense_variant | 16/19 | ENST00000382100.8 | NP_003374.3 | |
LOC105375957 | XR_929436.3 | n.28188G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 3/3 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VLDLR | ENST00000382100.8 | c.2291C>T | p.Thr764Met | missense_variant | 16/19 | 1 | NM_003383.5 | ENSP00000371532 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00246 AC: 374AN: 152104Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00120 AC: 302AN: 250652Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.00103 AC XY: 140AN XY: 135500
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000558 AC: 816AN: 1461674Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000503 AC XY: 366AN XY: 727118
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00246 AC: 374AN: 152222Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00228 AC XY: 170AN XY: 74444
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 16, 2020 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | Feb 01, 2024 | VLDLR: BP4, BS2 - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 31, 2024 | - - |
Cerebellar ataxia, intellectual disability, and dysequilibrium syndrome 1 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Oct 31, 2018 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
VLDLR-related disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Dec 20, 2019 | This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at