9-34725745-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBA1
The NM_001141917.2(SPATA31F1):c.1495A>G(p.Met499Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.671 in 1,546,872 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 346,853 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M499I) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001141917.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPATA31F1 | NM_001141917.2 | c.1495A>G | p.Met499Val | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 4 | ENST00000378788.4 | NP_001135389.1 | |
PHF24 | XM_047423102.1 | c.133+22707T>C | intron_variant | Intron 4 of 11 | XP_047279058.1 | |||
PHF24 | XM_047423103.1 | c.70+22707T>C | intron_variant | Intron 2 of 9 | XP_047279059.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.643 AC: 96792AN: 150538Hom.: 30357 Cov.: 28 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.682 AC: 104811AN: 153610 AF XY: 0.693 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.674 AC: 940789AN: 1396222Hom.: 316478 Cov.: 71 AF XY: 0.678 AC XY: 466156AN XY: 687998 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.643 AC: 96855AN: 150650Hom.: 30375 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.646 AC XY: 47511AN XY: 73528 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at