9-35089402-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 2P and 5B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_032634.4(PIGO):c.3118G>A(p.Val1040Ile) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000196 in 1,614,056 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V1040F) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00026 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00019 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

PIGO
NM_032634.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:4B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 5.89

Publications

3 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

PIGO (HGNC:23215): (phosphatidylinositol glycan anchor biosynthesis class O) This gene encodes a protein that is involved in glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchor biosynthesis. The GPI-anchor is a glycolipid which contains three mannose molecules in its core backbone. The GPI-anchor is found on many blood cells and serves to anchor proteins to the cell surface. This protein is involved in the transfer of ethanolaminephosphate (EtNP) to the third mannose in GPI. At least three alternatively spliced transcripts encoding two distinct isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2011]

PIGO Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

complex neurodevelopmental disorder
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
hyperphosphatasia with intellectual disability syndrome 2
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Illumina, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
hyperphosphatasia-intellectual disability syndrome
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

PIGO links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.018099636).

BP6

Variant 9-35089402-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-35089402-C-T is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 366753.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PIGO	NM_032634.4 link	c.3118G>A	p.Val1040Ile	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 11	ENST00000378617.4	NP_116023.2	Q8TEQ8-1
PIGO	NM_001201484.2 link	c.1867G>A	p.Val623Ile	missense_variant	Exon 12 of 13		NP_001188413.1	Q8TEQ8-2
PIGO	NM_152850.4 link	c.1867G>A	p.Val623Ile	missense_variant	Exon 11 of 12		NP_690577.2	Q8TEQ8-2
PIGO	XM_005251619.4 link	c.3118G>A	p.Val1040Ile	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 11		XP_005251676.1	Q8TEQ8-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PIGO	ENST00000378617.4 link	c.3118G>A	p.Val1040Ile	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 11	1	NM_032634.4	ENSP00000367880.3		Q8TEQ8-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000263

AC:

AN:

152168

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00979

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000362

AC:

AN:

251454

AF XY:

0.000338

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00665

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000462

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000141

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000652

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000189

AC:

277

AN:

1461888

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000197

AC XY:

143

AN XY:

727246

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33480

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00735

AC:

192

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000104

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000187

AC:

AN:

53416

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

1112012

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000430

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.461

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000263

AC:

AN:

152168

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000229

AC XY:

AN XY:

74336

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000241

AC:

AN:

41442

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15268

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00979

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10616

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

68032

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000478

AC:

AN:

2092

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.498

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000741

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000204

ExAC

AF:

0.000247

AC:

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.000356

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:4Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Hyperphosphatasia with intellectual disability syndrome 2

Uncertain:3Benign:1

Nov 11, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Jan 24, 2020

Division Of Personalized Genomic Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The c.3118G>A variant in the PIGO gene is missense variant, which results in the substitution of a conserved valine residue at amino acid position 1040 for an isoleucine (NP_116023.2). This variant localizes to coding exon 10 of the PIGO gene (11 coding exons in total; NM_032634.4). In silico predictors for this variant are not consistent: It is predicted to be neutral to protein structure and/or function by PROVEAN, but is predicted to be damaging by SIFT. This variant was reported in Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD) with an allelic frequency of 0.0325% (92 out of 282,864 alleles). This variant is reported in ClinVar with three submissions of conflicting interpretation of pathogenicity, with two laboratories classifying it as a variant of uncertain clinical significance and one variant classifying it as likely benign (Variation ID# 366753). To the best of our knowledge, this specific variant has not been reported in the literature. Given this evidence, the c.3118G>A, p.Val1040Ile variant in PIGO is considered a variant of uncertain clinical significance. Parental studies were not conducted at our laboratory, but this variant was reported to be paternally inherited at another laboratory in a separate pregnancy of same parents (2019). -

May 07, 2020

New York Genome Center

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

PIGO-related disorder

Uncertain:1

Oct 13, 2022

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The PIGO c.3118G>A variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Val1040Ile. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature. This variant is reported in 0.65% of alleles in individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish descent in gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/9-35089399-C-T), which is likely too frequent for a pathogenic variant. At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence. -

not provided

Benign:1

Jan 14, 2021

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.18

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.12

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.16

CADD

Uncertain

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.050

.;.;T

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.78

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.76

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.99

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.96

.;D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.016

MetaRNN

Benign

0.018

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.72

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.6

.;.;M

PhyloP100

5.9

PrimateAI

Benign

0.48

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.64

N;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.25

Sift

Uncertain

0.012

D;D;D

Sift4G

Uncertain

0.019

D;D;D

Polyphen

1.0

D;D;D

Vest4

0.34

MVP

0.42

MPC

0.15

ClinPred

0.11

GERP RS

5.7

Varity_R

0.37

gMVP

0.30

Mutation Taster

=78/22

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.030

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over