9-35683152-G-A
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_003289.4(TPM2):c.*7C>T variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00675 in 1,553,072 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 565 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.036 ( 305 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0036 ( 260 hom. )
Consequence
TPM2
NM_003289.4 3_prime_UTR
NM_003289.4 3_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.712
Genes affected
TPM2 (HGNC:12011): (tropomyosin 2) This gene encodes beta-tropomyosin, a member of the actin filament binding protein family, and mainly expressed in slow, type 1 muscle fibers. Mutations in this gene can alter the expression of other sarcomeric tropomyosin proteins, and cause cap disease, nemaline myopathy and distal arthrogryposis syndromes. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, Mar 2009]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.32).
BP6
Variant 9-35683152-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-35683152-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 94121.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-35683152-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.121 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPM2 | NM_003289.4 | c.*7C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 9/9 | ENST00000645482.3 | ||
TPM2 | NM_001301227.2 | c.*7C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 9/9 | |||
TPM2 | NM_001301226.2 | c.773-989C>T | intron_variant | ||||
TPM2 | NM_213674.1 | c.773-989C>T | intron_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TPM2 | ENST00000645482.3 | c.*7C>T | 3_prime_UTR_variant | 9/9 | NM_003289.4 | A1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0356 AC: 5421AN: 152150Hom.: 303 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
5421
AN:
152150
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00829 AC: 1320AN: 159324Hom.: 71 AF XY: 0.00604 AC XY: 506AN XY: 83826
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
1320
AN:
159324
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
506
AN XY:
83826
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00360 AC: 5038AN: 1400806Hom.: 260 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00307 AC XY: 2120AN XY: 691070
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
5038
AN:
1400806
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
2120
AN XY:
691070
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0358 AC: 5444AN: 152266Hom.: 305 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0338 AC XY: 2517AN XY: 74450
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
5444
AN:
152266
Hom.:
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
AC XY:
2517
AN XY:
74450
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
28
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:6
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jan 29, 2013 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 26, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Arthrogryposis, distal, type 1A Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Congenital myopathy 23 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at