9-35792191-C-T
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBA1
The NM_003995.4(NPR2):c.-218C>T variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00728 in 550,288 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 146 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★).
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.021 ( 117 hom., cov: 23)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0021 ( 29 hom. )
Consequence
NPR2
NM_003995.4 5_prime_UTR
NM_003995.4 5_prime_UTR
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.0770
Genes affected
NPR2 (HGNC:7944): (natriuretic peptide receptor 2) This gene encodes natriuretic peptide receptor B, one of two integral membrane receptors for natriuretic peptides. Both NPR1 and NPR2 contain five functional domains: an extracellular ligand-binding domain, a single membrane-spanning region, and intracellularly a protein kinase homology domain, a helical hinge region involved in oligomerization, and a carboxyl-terminal guanylyl cyclase catalytic domain. The protein is the primary receptor for C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP), which upon ligand binding exhibits greatly increased guanylyl cyclase activity. Mutations in this gene are the cause of acromesomelic dysplasia Maroteaux type. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.85).
BP6
Variant 9-35792191-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-35792191-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 1280206.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0719 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NPR2 | NM_003995.4 | c.-218C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/22 | ENST00000342694.7 | NP_003986.2 | ||
NPR2 | NM_001378923.1 | c.-218C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/22 | NP_001365852.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NPR2 | ENST00000342694.7 | c.-218C>T | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/22 | 1 | NM_003995.4 | ENSP00000341083 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0210 AC: 3146AN: 150066Hom.: 117 Cov.: 23
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
3146
AN:
150066
Hom.:
Cov.:
23
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00213 AC: 852AN: 400114Hom.: 29 Cov.: 4 AF XY: 0.00177 AC XY: 376AN XY: 212818
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
852
AN:
400114
Hom.:
Cov.:
4
AF XY:
AC XY:
376
AN XY:
212818
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0210 AC: 3154AN: 150174Hom.: 117 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.0202 AC XY: 1479AN XY: 73372
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
3154
AN:
150174
Hom.:
Cov.:
23
AF XY:
AC XY:
1479
AN XY:
73372
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 20, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
CADD
Benign
DANN
Benign
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at