9-35958011-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points: 0P and 16B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_019897.2(OR2S2):c.88G>A(p.Val30Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00115 in 1,614,136 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 19 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_019897.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -16 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR2S2 | NM_019897.2 | c.88G>A | p.Val30Met | missense_variant | 1/1 | ENST00000341959.2 | NP_063950.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR2S2 | ENST00000341959.2 | c.88G>A | p.Val30Met | missense_variant | 1/1 | 6 | NM_019897.2 | ENSP00000344040.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00396 AC: 602AN: 152124Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00184 AC: 463AN: 251402Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.00199 AC XY: 271AN XY: 135862
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000859 AC: 1256AN: 1461894Hom.: 15 Cov.: 38 AF XY: 0.00103 AC XY: 750AN XY: 727248
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00397 AC: 604AN: 152242Hom.: 4 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00395 AC XY: 294AN XY: 74418
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jul 23, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at