9-433978-A-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points: 0P and 18B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_203447.4(DOCK8):​c.4886+3A>G variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.756 in 1,607,664 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 463,525 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.70 ( 38454 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.76 ( 425071 hom. )

Consequence

DOCK8
NM_203447.4 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.004113
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.00

Publications

13 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DOCK8 (HGNC:19191): (dedicator of cytokinesis 8) This gene encodes a member of the DOCK180 family of guanine nucleotide exchange factors. Guanine nucleotide exchange factors interact with Rho GTPases and are components of intracellular signaling networks. Mutations in this gene result in the autosomal recessive form of the hyper-IgE syndrome. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been described.[provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]
DOCK8 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • combined immunodeficiency due to DOCK8 deficiency
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
  • autosomal dominant non-syndromic intellectual disability
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • complex neurodevelopmental disorder
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -18 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.36).
BP6
Variant 9-433978-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-433978-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 163177.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.958 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DOCK8NM_203447.4 linkc.4886+3A>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 38 of 47 ENST00000432829.7 NP_982272.2 Q8NF50-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DOCK8ENST00000432829.7 linkc.4886+3A>G splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 38 of 47 1 NM_203447.4 ENSP00000394888.3 Q8NF50-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.701
AC:
106442
AN:
151928
Hom.:
38438
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.508
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.638
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.795
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.730
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.981
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.687
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.788
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.763
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.761
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.716
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.767
AC:
192569
AN:
251210
AF XY:
0.763
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.503
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.852
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.709
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.985
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.796
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.765
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.757
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.761
AC:
1108163
AN:
1455618
Hom.:
425071
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.759
AC XY:
550337
AN XY:
724626
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.498
AC:
16608
AN:
33364
American (AMR)
AF:
0.846
AC:
37837
AN:
44718
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.710
AC:
18533
AN:
26100
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.981
AC:
38927
AN:
39688
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.688
AC:
59205
AN:
86108
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.795
AC:
42417
AN:
53376
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.708
AC:
4081
AN:
5762
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.764
AC:
845089
AN:
1106298
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.755
AC:
45466
AN:
60204
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.455
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
12420
24841
37261
49682
62102
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20262
40524
60786
81048
101310
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.700
AC:
106507
AN:
152046
Hom.:
38454
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.705
AC XY:
52415
AN XY:
74326
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.508
AC:
21052
AN:
41418
American (AMR)
AF:
0.795
AC:
12164
AN:
15298
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.730
AC:
2536
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.981
AC:
5083
AN:
5182
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.688
AC:
3316
AN:
4818
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.788
AC:
8340
AN:
10582
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.762
AC:
224
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.761
AC:
51698
AN:
67966
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.719
AC:
1515
AN:
2108
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.504
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1493
2985
4478
5970
7463
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
818
1636
2454
3272
4090
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.739
Hom.:
40346
Bravo
AF:
0.695
Asia WGS
AF:
0.821
AC:
2854
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.749
EpiControl
AF:
0.761

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10Other:1
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 12, 2023
Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 97% of patients studied by a panel of primary immunodeficiencies. Number of patients: 93. Only high quality variants are reported. -

Feb 21, 2013
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

4886+3A>G in intron 38 of DOCK8: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 48.5% (2135/4406) of African Ameri can chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (h ttp://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs2360712). -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2Other:1
-
GenomeConnect, ClinGen
Significance:not provided
Review Status:no classification provided
Collection Method:phenotyping only

Variant interpreted as Benign and reported on 04-27-2020 by Lab or GTR ID 500031. GenomeConnect assertions are reported exactly as they appear on the patient-provided report from the testing laboratory. GenomeConnect staff make no attempt to reinterpret the clinical significance of the variant. This variant was reported in an individual referred for clinical diagnostic genetic testing. -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Combined immunodeficiency due to DOCK8 deficiency Benign:2
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jul 14, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.36
CADD
Benign
18
DANN
Benign
0.90
PhyloP100
2.0
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.0041
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.20
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2360712; hg19: chr9-433978; API