9-6610192-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PP3_Strong
The NM_000170.3(GLDC):c.635G>A(p.Arg212Lys) variant causes a missense, splice region change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000117 in 1,456,848 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. 2/3 splice prediction tools predicting alterations to normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R212I) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000170.3 missense, splice_region
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_pathogenic. Variant got 6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDC | NM_000170.3 | c.635G>A | p.Arg212Lys | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | 4/25 | ENST00000321612.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLDC | ENST00000321612.8 | c.635G>A | p.Arg212Lys | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | 4/25 | 1 | NM_000170.3 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000165 AC: 4AN: 242638Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000152 AC XY: 2AN XY: 131156
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000117 AC: 17AN: 1456848Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000152 AC XY: 11AN XY: 724266
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Non-ketotic hyperglycinemia Pathogenic:1Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Sep 15, 2022 | This sequence change replaces arginine, which is basic and polar, with lysine, which is basic and polar, at codon 212 of the GLDC protein (p.Arg212Lys). This variant also falls at the last nucleotide of exon 4, which is part of the consensus splice site for this exon. This variant is present in population databases (rs386833584, gnomAD 0.01%). This missense change has been observed in individual(s) with clinical features of non-ketotic hyperglycinemia (PMID: 16601880). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 56173). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (SIFT, PolyPhen-2, Align-GVGD) all suggest that this variant is likely to be tolerated. Variants that disrupt the consensus splice site are a relatively common cause of aberrant splicing (PMID: 17576681, 9536098). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of sequence changes on RNA splicing suggest that this variant may disrupt the consensus splice site. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. - |
Likely pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | Juha Muilu Group; Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM) | - | - - |
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Mar 30, 2020 | - - |
not specified Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 11, 2023 | Variant summary: GLDC c.635G>A (p.Arg212Lys) results in a conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a damaging effect of the variant on protein function. Several computational tools predict a significant impact on normal splicing: Four predict the variant weakens a canonical 5' splicing donor site. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 1.6e-05 in 242638 control chromosomes (gnomAD). The available data on variant occurrences in the general population are insufficient to allow any conclusion about variant significance. c.635G>A has been reported in the literature in an individual affected with Glycine Encephalopathy (Non-Ketotic Hyperglycinemia) without another variant identified in trans (Conter_2006). This report does not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Glycine Encephalopathy (Non-Ketotic Hyperglycinemia). To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. The following publication has been ascertained in the context of this evaluation (PMID: 16601880). Three submitters have cited clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014. All submitters classified the variant as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as uncertain significance. - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jul 23, 2019 | Reported in a patient with nonketotic hyperglycinemia in published literature; however, a second GLDC variant was not identified (Conter et al., 2006); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; In-silico analysis, which includes splice predictors and evolutionary conservation, is inconclusive as to whether the variant alters gene splicing. In the absence of RNA/functional studies, the actual effect of this sequence change is unknown.; Not observed at a significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016); This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 31589614, 16601880) - |
Glycine encephalopathy 1 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Genomic Medicine, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center | Mar 26, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at