9-69248208-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 0P and 0B.
The NM_004817.4(TJP2):c.2864C>T(p.Pro955Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000318 in 1,602,592 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P955T) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004817.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- cholestasis, progressive familial intrahepatic, 4Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing lossInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
- familial hypercholanemiaInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- nonsyndromic genetic hearing lossInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen
- hypercholanemia, familial 1Inheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_004817.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TJP2 | NM_004817.4 | MANE Select | c.2864C>T | p.Pro955Leu | missense | Exon 19 of 23 | NP_004808.2 | ||
| TJP2 | NM_001170416.2 | c.2957C>T | p.Pro986Leu | missense | Exon 19 of 23 | NP_001163887.1 | |||
| TJP2 | NM_001369875.1 | c.2876C>T | p.Pro959Leu | missense | Exon 19 of 23 | NP_001356804.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TJP2 | ENST00000377245.9 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.2864C>T | p.Pro955Leu | missense | Exon 19 of 23 | ENSP00000366453.4 | ||
| ENSG00000285130 | ENST00000642889.1 | c.3251C>T | p.Pro1084Leu | missense | Exon 21 of 25 | ENSP00000493780.1 | |||
| TJP2 | ENST00000348208.9 | TSL:1 | c.2864C>T | p.Pro955Leu | missense | Exon 19 of 21 | ENSP00000345893.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000118 AC: 18AN: 152148Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000223 AC: 5AN: 224416 AF XY: 0.0000246 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000228 AC: 33AN: 1450444Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000347 AC XY: 25AN XY: 720726 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000118 AC: 18AN: 152148Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000807 AC XY: 6AN XY: 74338 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2
In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge
not specified Uncertain:1
The p.Pro955Leu variant in TJP2 has not been previously reported in individuals with hearing loss, but has been identified in 2/6058 African chromosomes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org). Computation al prediction tools and conservation analyses do not provide strong support for or against an impact to the protein. In summary, the clinical significance of th e p.Pro955Leu variant is uncertain.
TJP2-related disorder Uncertain:1
The TJP2 c.2864C>T variant is predicted to result in the amino acid substitution p.Pro955Leu. To our knowledge, this variant has not been reported in the literature. This variant is reported in 0.031% of alleles in individuals of African descent in gnomAD. At this time, the clinical significance of this variant is uncertain due to the absence of conclusive functional and genetic evidence.
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at