9-91361708-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_001698.3(AUH):c.182C>G(p.Pro61Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000713 in 1,402,912 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P61H) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001698.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- 3-methylglutaconic aciduria type 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001698.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUH | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.182C>G | p.Pro61Arg | missense | Exon 1 of 10 | ENSP00000364883.5 | Q13825-1 | ||
| AUH | TSL:1 | c.182C>G | p.Pro61Arg | missense | Exon 1 of 9 | ENSP00000307334.5 | Q13825-2 | ||
| AUH | c.182C>G | p.Pro61Arg | missense | Exon 1 of 11 | ENSP00000565985.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 7.13e-7 AC: 1AN: 1402912Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000144 AC XY: 1AN XY: 692570 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at