9-91731048-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points: 2P and 20B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_004560.4(ROR2):c.1045C>G(p.His349Asp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00361 in 1,614,150 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 189 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. H349H) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004560.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -18 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROR2 | NM_004560.4 | c.1045C>G | p.His349Asp | missense_variant | 7/9 | ENST00000375708.4 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROR2 | ENST00000375708.4 | c.1045C>G | p.His349Asp | missense_variant | 7/9 | 1 | NM_004560.4 | P1 | |
ROR2 | ENST00000375715.5 | c.625C>G | p.His209Asp | missense_variant | 7/13 | 1 | |||
ROR2 | ENST00000550066.5 | n.1513C>G | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 9/11 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? AF: 0.0183 AC: 2789AN: 152160Hom.: 103 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00503 AC: 1265AN: 251428Hom.: 34 AF XY: 0.00373 AC XY: 507AN XY: 135914
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00207 AC: 3033AN: 1461872Hom.: 85 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00189 AC XY: 1373AN XY: 727240
GnomAD4 genome ? AF: 0.0184 AC: 2795AN: 152278Hom.: 104 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0175 AC XY: 1305AN XY: 74472
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Oct 28, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Nov 22, 2019 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Jan 26, 2024 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Feb 08, 2013 | - - |
Autosomal recessive Robinow syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Brachydactyly type B1 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at