9-92715324-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 3P and 4B. PP2PP3_ModerateBS2
The ENST00000356884.11(BICD2):c.2398G>A(p.Glu800Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000089 in 1,460,552 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E800Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
ENST00000356884.11 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BICD2 | NM_001003800.2 | c.2398G>A | p.Glu800Lys | missense_variant | 7/7 | ENST00000356884.11 | NP_001003800.1 | |
BICD2 | NM_015250.4 | c.2398G>A | p.Glu800Lys | missense_variant | 7/8 | NP_056065.1 | ||
BICD2 | XM_017014551.2 | c.2479G>A | p.Glu827Lys | missense_variant | 7/8 | XP_016870040.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BICD2 | ENST00000356884.11 | c.2398G>A | p.Glu800Lys | missense_variant | 7/7 | 1 | NM_001003800.2 | ENSP00000349351 | A2 | |
BICD2 | ENST00000375512.3 | c.2398G>A | p.Glu800Lys | missense_variant | 7/8 | 1 | ENSP00000364662 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000890 AC: 13AN: 1460552Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000826 AC XY: 6AN XY: 726624
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Oct 19, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at