9-95446931-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000264.5(PTCH1):c.4325G>A(p.Arg1442Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000693 in 1,614,106 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1442W) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00046 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00072 ( 4 hom. )

Consequence

PTCH1
NM_000264.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:12O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.947

Variant links:

Genes affected

PTCH1 (HGNC:9585): (patched 1) This gene encodes a member of the patched family of proteins and a component of the hedgehog signaling pathway. Hedgehog signaling is important in embryonic development and tumorigenesis. The encoded protein is the receptor for the secreted hedgehog ligands, which include sonic hedgehog, indian hedgehog and desert hedgehog. Following binding by one of the hedgehog ligands, the encoded protein is trafficked away from the primary cilium, relieving inhibition of the G-protein-coupled receptor smoothened, which results in activation of downstream signaling. Mutations of this gene have been associated with basal cell nevus syndrome and holoprosencephaly. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

PTCH1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0073398054).

BP6

Variant 9-95446931-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-95446931-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 41667.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=5, Benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1, not_provided=1}. Variant chr9-95446931-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00046 (70/152324) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00483 (25/5176). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00336. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 35 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 70 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PTCH1	NM_000264.5 link	c.4325G>A	p.Arg1442Gln	missense_variant	Exon 23 of 24	ENST00000331920.11	NP_000255.2	Q13635-1
PTCH1	NM_001083603.3 link	c.4322G>A	p.Arg1441Gln	missense_variant	Exon 23 of 24	ENST00000437951.6	NP_001077072.1	Q13635-2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PTCH1	ENST00000331920.11 link	c.4325G>A	p.Arg1442Gln	missense_variant	Exon 23 of 24	5	NM_000264.5	ENSP00000332353.6		Q13635-1
PTCH1	ENST00000437951.6 link	c.4322G>A	p.Arg1441Gln	missense_variant	Exon 23 of 24	5	NM_001083603.3	ENSP00000389744.2		Q13635-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000460

AC:

AN:

152206

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000145

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00482

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000559

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000434

AC:

109

AN:

251062

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000398

AC XY:

AN XY:

135706

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000123

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000578

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00315

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000980

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000362

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000489

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000718

AC:

1049

AN:

1461782

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000694

AC XY:

505

AN XY:

727186

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000149

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000112

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.0146

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000696

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0000562

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000379

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000464

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000460

AC:

AN:

152324

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000470

AC XY:

AN XY:

74478

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000144

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.0000653

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00483

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000559

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000648

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000397

TwinsUK

AF:

0.00

AC:

ALSPAC

AF:

0.00104

AC:

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000227

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000502

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00202

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.000327

EpiControl

AF:

0.000296

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:12Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:2Benign:3

Jul 13, 2012

Biesecker Lab/Clinical Genomics Section, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: research

- -

Nov 03, 2021

Institute for Clinical Genetics, University Hospital TU Dresden, University Hospital TU Dresden

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jun 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

PTCH1: BP4, BS1 -

not specified

Benign:3Other:1

Sep 19, 2013

ITMI

Significance: not provided

Review Status: no classification provided

Collection Method: reference population

- -

Mar 04, 2025

Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 19, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Gorlin syndrome

Benign:2

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Jan 23, 2019

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Apr 14, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

PTCH1-related disorder

Benign:1

Jul 09, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Holoprosencephaly 7

Benign:1

Apr 27, 2017

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.071

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.44

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.41

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.20

T;.;.;.;.;.;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.51

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.29

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.84

LIST_S2

Benign

0.79

T;.;T;T;.;.;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.042

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0073

T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.78

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.69

N;.;.;.;.;.;.

PrimateAI

Benign

0.20

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.010

N;N;N;N;N;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.22

Sift

Benign

0.58

T;T;T;T;T;T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.66

T;T;T;T;T;T;T

Polyphen

0.0020

B;.;.;B;B;.;B

Vest4

0.079

MVP

0.50

MPC

0.088

ClinPred

0.022

GERP RS

3.2

Varity_R

0.037

gMVP

0.18

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.010

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over