9-95447348-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000264.5(PTCH1):c.3908G>A(p.Arg1303His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000607 in 1,613,462 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R1303C) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000079 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000059 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

PTCH1
NM_000264.5 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.110

Variant links:

Genes affected

PTCH1 (HGNC:9585): (patched 1) This gene encodes a member of the patched family of proteins and a component of the hedgehog signaling pathway. Hedgehog signaling is important in embryonic development and tumorigenesis. The encoded protein is the receptor for the secreted hedgehog ligands, which include sonic hedgehog, indian hedgehog and desert hedgehog. Following binding by one of the hedgehog ligands, the encoded protein is trafficked away from the primary cilium, relieving inhibition of the G-protein-coupled receptor smoothened, which results in activation of downstream signaling. Mutations of this gene have been associated with basal cell nevus syndrome and holoprosencephaly. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

PTCH1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.025260776).

BP6

Variant 9-95447348-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-95447348-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 237489.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000589 (86/1461168) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00107 (48/44716). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000832. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 37 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 12 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PTCH1	NM_000264.5 link	c.3908G>A	p.Arg1303His	missense_variant	Exon 23 of 24	ENST00000331920.11	NP_000255.2	Q13635-1
PTCH1	NM_001083603.3 link	c.3905G>A	p.Arg1302His	missense_variant	Exon 23 of 24	ENST00000437951.6	NP_001077072.1	Q13635-2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PTCH1	ENST00000331920.11 link	c.3908G>A	p.Arg1303His	missense_variant	Exon 23 of 24	5	NM_000264.5	ENSP00000332353.6		Q13635-1
PTCH1	ENST00000437951.6 link	c.3905G>A	p.Arg1302His	missense_variant	Exon 23 of 24	5	NM_001083603.3	ENSP00000389744.2		Q13635-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000789

AC:

AN:

152176

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000458

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000182

AC:

AN:

246920

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000134

AC XY:

AN XY:

134668

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00119

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000327

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000180

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000166

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000589

AC:

AN:

1461168

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000509

AC XY:

AN XY:

726904

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00107

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000464

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000261

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000828

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000788

AC:

AN:

152294

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000672

AC XY:

AN XY:

74456

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.000457

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000194

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.000414

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.0000868

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000132

ExAC

AF:

0.000140

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Gorlin syndrome

Benign:2

Feb 02, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:2

Apr 30, 2019

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Apr 25, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:2

Dec 15, 2020

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Dec 13, 2021

Sema4, Sema4

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: curation

- -

PTCH1-related disorder

Benign:1

Jan 06, 2023

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Holoprosencephaly 7

Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.091

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.37

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.35

CADD

Benign

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.22

T;.;.;.;.;.;.

Eigen

Benign

-0.49

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.43

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.34

LIST_S2

Benign

0.71

T;.;T;T;.;.;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.073

MetaRNN

Benign

0.025

T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.36

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.81

L;.;.;.;.;.;.

PrimateAI

Benign

0.21

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.10

N;N;N;N;N;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.16

Sift

Benign

0.10

T;T;T;T;T;T;T

Sift4G

Benign

0.26

T;T;T;T;T;T;T

Polyphen

0.0

B;.;.;P;P;.;B

Vest4

0.12

MutPred

0.18

Loss of helix (P = 0.0444);.;.;.;.;.;.;

MVP

0.59

MPC

0.13

ClinPred

0.046

GERP RS

1.6

Varity_R

0.060

gMVP

0.24

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over