9-95467108-C-T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000264.5(PTCH1):​c.2560+8G>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00109 in 1,613,888 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00049 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0012 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

PTCH1
NM_000264.5 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00004900
2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: -2.20

Publications

1 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
PTCH1 (HGNC:9585): (patched 1) This gene encodes a member of the patched family of proteins and a component of the hedgehog signaling pathway. Hedgehog signaling is important in embryonic development and tumorigenesis. The encoded protein is the receptor for the secreted hedgehog ligands, which include sonic hedgehog, indian hedgehog and desert hedgehog. Following binding by one of the hedgehog ligands, the encoded protein is trafficked away from the primary cilium, relieving inhibition of the G-protein-coupled receptor smoothened, which results in activation of downstream signaling. Mutations of this gene have been associated with basal cell nevus syndrome and holoprosencephaly. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]
PTCH1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • basal cell nevus syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
  • holoprosencephaly 7
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
  • nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
  • holoprosencephaly
    Inheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Illumina

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.89).
BP6
Variant 9-95467108-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-95467108-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 135882.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000493 (75/152136) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.000956 (65/68020). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000769. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 39 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 75 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PTCH1NM_000264.5 linkc.2560+8G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 15 of 23 ENST00000331920.11 NP_000255.2 Q13635-1
PTCH1NM_001083603.3 linkc.2557+8G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 15 of 23 ENST00000437951.6 NP_001077072.1 Q13635-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PTCH1ENST00000331920.11 linkc.2560+8G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 15 of 23 5 NM_000264.5 ENSP00000332353.6 Q13635-1
PTCH1ENST00000437951.6 linkc.2557+8G>A splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 15 of 23 5 NM_001083603.3 ENSP00000389744.2 Q13635-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000493
AC:
75
AN:
152136
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000121
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.000131
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000944
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000956
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000733
AC:
184
AN:
251116
AF XY:
0.000729
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000123
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0000578
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000139
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00151
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000816
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00115
AC:
1684
AN:
1461752
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00109
AC XY:
792
AN XY:
727186
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000269
AC:
9
AN:
33474
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000447
AC:
2
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000464
AC:
4
AN:
86250
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000225
AC:
12
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00143
AC:
1591
AN:
1111894
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00109
AC:
66
AN:
60390
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.485
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
87
175
262
350
437
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
60
120
180
240
300
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000493
AC:
75
AN:
152136
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000525
AC XY:
39
AN XY:
74328
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000121
AC:
5
AN:
41420
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000131
AC:
2
AN:
15282
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5200
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000207
AC:
1
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000944
AC:
1
AN:
10598
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000956
AC:
65
AN:
68020
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000478
AC:
1
AN:
2090
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.512
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
4
8
13
17
21
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00101
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000525
EpiCase
AF:
0.00115
EpiControl
AF:
0.000949

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
Mar 04, 2025
Center for Genomic Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 20, 2021
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 27, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Gorlin syndrome Benign:3
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Jun 24, 2024
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
May 01, 2025
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

PTCH1: BP4, BS1 -

Jan 05, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

PTCH1-related disorder Benign:1
May 20, 2024
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Jan 05, 2016
Vantari Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Holoprosencephaly 7 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.89
CADD
Benign
0.13
DANN
Benign
0.54
PhyloP100
-2.2
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000049
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs201541845; hg19: chr9-98229390; COSMIC: COSV105898098; API