9-95468824-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBP6BS2

The NM_000264.5(PTCH1):​c.2177C>G​(p.Pro726Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000948 in 1,614,022 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.000099 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.000094 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

PTCH1
NM_000264.5 missense

Scores

3
10
6

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:7

Conservation

PhyloP100: 7.36
Variant links:
Genes affected
PTCH1 (HGNC:9585): (patched 1) This gene encodes a member of the patched family of proteins and a component of the hedgehog signaling pathway. Hedgehog signaling is important in embryonic development and tumorigenesis. The encoded protein is the receptor for the secreted hedgehog ligands, which include sonic hedgehog, indian hedgehog and desert hedgehog. Following binding by one of the hedgehog ligands, the encoded protein is trafficked away from the primary cilium, relieving inhibition of the G-protein-coupled receptor smoothened, which results in activation of downstream signaling. Mutations of this gene have been associated with basal cell nevus syndrome and holoprosencephaly. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.04925421).
BP6
Variant 9-95468824-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-95468824-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 135877.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=1}. Variant chr9-95468824-G-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 15 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PTCH1NM_000264.5 linkc.2177C>G p.Pro726Arg missense_variant Exon 14 of 24 ENST00000331920.11 NP_000255.2 Q13635-1
PTCH1NM_001083603.3 linkc.2174C>G p.Pro725Arg missense_variant Exon 14 of 24 ENST00000437951.6 NP_001077072.1 Q13635-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PTCH1ENST00000331920.11 linkc.2177C>G p.Pro726Arg missense_variant Exon 14 of 24 5 NM_000264.5 ENSP00000332353.6 Q13635-1
PTCH1ENST00000437951.6 linkc.2174C>G p.Pro725Arg missense_variant Exon 14 of 24 5 NM_001083603.3 ENSP00000389744.2 Q13635-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000986
AC:
15
AN:
152134
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00374
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000155
AC:
39
AN:
251480
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000118
AC XY:
16
AN XY:
135912
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00337
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000352
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000944
AC:
138
AN:
1461888
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000963
AC XY:
70
AN XY:
727248
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000597
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00356
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0000252
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000207
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000315
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000986
AC:
15
AN:
152134
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000807
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
74326
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00374
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000545
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000121
ExAC
AF:
0.000115
AC:
14
EpiCase
AF:
0.000164
EpiControl
AF:
0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:7
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Gorlin syndrome Benign:2
Jan 22, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:2
Jul 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

PTCH1: BS1 -

Oct 11, 2022
Quest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan Capistrano
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Jun 01, 2018
Ambry Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

May 18, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: curation

- -

Holoprosencephaly 7 Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

PTCH1-related disorder Benign:1
May 25, 2021
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.089
BayesDel_addAF
Pathogenic
0.18
D
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.090
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.59
D;.;.;.;.;.;.
Eigen
Uncertain
0.25
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.36
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.80
T;.;T;T;.;.;T
M_CAP
Uncertain
0.16
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.049
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.27
D
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.1
M;.;.;.;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.70
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.8
D;D;D;D;D;D;D
REVEL
Pathogenic
0.69
Sift
Benign
0.11
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.17
T;T;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.040
B;P;P;B;B;P;B
Vest4
0.42
MVP
0.43
MPC
0.60
ClinPred
0.23
T
GERP RS
4.8
Varity_R
0.22
gMVP
0.57

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs587780697; hg19: chr9-98231106; API