9-95508253-C-G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 1P and 20B. PP2BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000264.5(PTCH1):ā€‹c.109G>Cā€‹(p.Gly37Arg) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000743 in 1,600,892 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā˜…ā˜…).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.0011 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.00071 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

PTCH1
NM_000264.5 missense

Scores

1
1
16

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 4.80
Variant links:
Genes affected
PTCH1 (HGNC:9585): (patched 1) This gene encodes a member of the patched family of proteins and a component of the hedgehog signaling pathway. Hedgehog signaling is important in embryonic development and tumorigenesis. The encoded protein is the receptor for the secreted hedgehog ligands, which include sonic hedgehog, indian hedgehog and desert hedgehog. Following binding by one of the hedgehog ligands, the encoded protein is trafficked away from the primary cilium, relieving inhibition of the G-protein-coupled receptor smoothened, which results in activation of downstream signaling. Mutations of this gene have been associated with basal cell nevus syndrome and holoprosencephaly. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

PP2
Missense variant in gene, where missense usually causes diseases (based on misZ statistic), PTCH1. . Gene score misZ 1.6774 (greater than the threshold 3.09). Trascript score misZ 3.1343 (greater than threshold 3.09). GenCC has associacion of gene with holoprosencephaly 7, nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome, holoprosencephaly.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.005396843).
BP6
Variant 9-95508253-C-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr9-95508253-C-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 237450.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr9-95508253-C-G is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr9-95508253-C-G is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00109 (165/151816) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.0156 (80/5142). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0128. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 112 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 165 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
PTCH1NM_000264.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.109G>C p.Gly37Arg missense_variant 1/24 ENST00000331920.11 NP_000255.2 Q13635-1
PTCH1NM_001083603.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.199-1654G>C intron_variant ENST00000437951.6 NP_001077072.1 Q13635-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PTCH1ENST00000331920.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.109G>C p.Gly37Arg missense_variant 1/245 NM_000264.5 ENSP00000332353.6 Q13635-1
PTCH1ENST00000437951.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.199-1654G>C intron_variant 5 NM_001083603.3 ENSP00000389744.2 Q13635-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00107
AC:
163
AN:
151704
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0153
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000621
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00333
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000664
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000480
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00143
AC:
322
AN:
225954
Hom.:
2
AF XY:
0.00144
AC XY:
180
AN XY:
125016
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0127
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000306
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00329
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000376
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000896
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000707
AC:
1025
AN:
1449076
Hom.:
6
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.000711
AC XY:
512
AN XY:
720324
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000302
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.0000227
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.0120
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000516
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00291
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.000273
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00106
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00109
AC:
165
AN:
151816
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00151
AC XY:
112
AN XY:
74190
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.0156
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000829
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00333
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000664
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000475
Alfa
AF:
0.00129
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000748
ExAC
AF:
0.00131
AC:
155

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingLaboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxApr 12, 2018This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCeGaT Center for Human Genetics TuebingenSep 01, 2024PTCH1: PM5, BS1 -
not specified Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingGenome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center-- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingQuest Diagnostics Nichols Institute San Juan CapistranoJul 15, 2021- -
Gorlin syndrome Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpFeb 01, 2024- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsDec 13, 2016This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Holoprosencephaly 7 Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 12, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.18
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.38
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.30
CADD
Benign
18
DANN
Benign
0.74
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.18
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.55
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.43
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.88
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.67
T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0054
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.61
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
0.41
N
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.88
D
PROVEAN
Benign
0.40
N
REVEL
Benign
0.25
Sift
Benign
0.22
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.17
T
Polyphen
0.0
B
Vest4
0.18
MutPred
0.17
Gain of helix (P = 0.027);
MVP
0.37
MPC
1.6
ClinPred
0.028
T
GERP RS
3.7
Varity_R
0.062
gMVP
0.56

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs199976372; hg19: chr9-98270535; COSMIC: COSV59466417; COSMIC: COSV59466417; API