Variant 9-97428519-T-C details in Genebe, Genetics Data Aggregator

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP7BS1_Supporting

The NM_014290.3(TDRD7):c.54T>C(p.His18His) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000157 in 1,461,732 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000016 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

TDRD7
NM_014290.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.783

Variant links:

Genes affected

TDRD7 (HGNC:30831): (tudor domain containing 7) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the Tudor family of proteins. This protein contains conserved Tudor domains and LOTUS domains. It is a component of RNA granules, which function in RNA processing. Mutations in this gene have been associated with cataract formation in mouse and human. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2014]

TDRD7 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.54).

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.783 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000157 (23/1461732) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00022 (19/86258). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000143. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 18 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TDRD7	NM_014290.3 linkuse as main transcript	c.54T>C	p.His18His	synonymous_variant	2/17	ENST00000355295.5	NP_055105.2	Q8NHU6-1
TDRD7	XM_047423111.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.54T>C	p.His18His	synonymous_variant	2/17		XP_047279067.1
TDRD7	XM_047423113.1 linkuse as main transcript	c.54T>C	p.His18His	synonymous_variant	2/14		XP_047279069.1
TDRD7	NM_001302884.2 linkuse as main transcript	c.-15-2414T>C		intron_variant			NP_001289813.1	Q8NHU6-2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TDRD7	ENST00000355295.5 linkuse as main transcript	c.54T>C	p.His18His	synonymous_variant	2/17	1	NM_014290.3	ENSP00000347444.4		Q8NHU6-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

Cov.:

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.0000318

AC:

AN:

251202

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000442

AC XY:

AN XY:

135734

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.000261

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000157

AC:

AN:

1461732

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000248

AC XY:

AN XY:

727174

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.000220

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000662

GnomAD4 genome

Cov.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00000756

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cataract 36

Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.54

CADD

Benign

8.4

DANN

Benign

0.63

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over