Menu
GeneBe

9-97428519-T-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP7BS1_Supporting

The NM_014290.3(TDRD7):c.54T>C(p.His18=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000157 in 1,461,732 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000016 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

TDRD7
NM_014290.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.783
Variant links:
Genes affected
TDRD7 (HGNC:30831): (tudor domain containing 7) The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the Tudor family of proteins. This protein contains conserved Tudor domains and LOTUS domains. It is a component of RNA granules, which function in RNA processing. Mutations in this gene have been associated with cataract formation in mouse and human. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Nov 2014]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.54).
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.783 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000157 (23/1461732) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00022 (19/86258). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000143. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 18 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 34. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
TDRD7NM_014290.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.54T>C p.His18= synonymous_variant 2/17 ENST00000355295.5
TDRD7XM_047423111.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.54T>C p.His18= synonymous_variant 2/17
TDRD7XM_047423113.1 linkuse as main transcriptc.54T>C p.His18= synonymous_variant 2/14
TDRD7NM_001302884.2 linkuse as main transcriptc.-15-2414T>C intron_variant

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
TDRD7ENST00000355295.5 linkuse as main transcriptc.54T>C p.His18= synonymous_variant 2/171 NM_014290.3 P1Q8NHU6-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
Cov.:
32
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000318
AC:
8
AN:
251202
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000442
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
135734
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.000261
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000157
AC:
23
AN:
1461732
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.0000248
AC XY:
18
AN XY:
727174
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.000220
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000662
GnomAD4 genome
Cov.:
32
Bravo
AF:
0.00000756

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Cataract 36 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.54
Cadd
Benign
8.4
Dann
Benign
0.63

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs749676206; hg19: chr9-100190801; API