9-97675261-T-G

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_000380.4(XPA):c.*178A>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000208 in 760,824 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000039 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00025 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

XPA
NM_000380.4 3_prime_UTR

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.327

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

XPA (HGNC:12814): (XPA, DNA damage recognition and repair factor) This gene encodes a zinc finger protein plays a central role in nucleotide excision repair (NER), a specialized type of DNA repair. NER is responsible for repair of UV radiation-induced photoproducts and DNA adducts induced by chemical carcinogens and chemotherapeutic drugs. The encoded protein interacts with DNA and several NER proteins, acting as a scaffold to assemble the NER incision complex at sites of DNA damage. Mutations in this gene cause Xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group A (XP-A), an autosomal recessive skin disorder featuring hypersensitivity to sunlight and increased risk for skin cancer. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2017]

XPA Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

xeroderma pigmentosum group A
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Myriad Women’s Health
xeroderma pigmentosum
Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

XPA links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAdExome4 allele frequency = 0.00025 (152/608648) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.00485 (151/31164). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00422. There are 3 homozygotes in GnomAdExome4. There are 77 alleles in the male GnomAdExome4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 8. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
XPA	NM_000380.4 link	c.*178A>C		3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 6 of 6	ENST00000375128.5	NP_000371.1	P23025

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
XPA	ENST00000375128.5 link	c.*178A>C	3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 6 of 6	1	NM_000380.4	ENSP00000364270.5	P23025
XPA	ENST00000462523.5 link	n.*436A>C	non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 7 of 7	5		ENSP00000433006.1	F2Z2T2
XPA	ENST00000485042.1 link	n.512A>C	non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 2 of 2	3
XPA	ENST00000462523.5 link	n.*436A>C	3_prime_UTR_variant	Exon 7 of 7	5		ENSP00000433006.1	F2Z2T2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000394

AC:

AN:

152176

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00115

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000431

AC:

AN:

115896

AF XY:

0.0000319

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000483

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000250

AC:

152

AN:

608648

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000238

AC XY:

AN XY:

323218

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

16134

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

30842

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

18492

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00485

AC:

151

AN:

31164

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

59448

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

32868

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2430

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00000259

AC:

AN:

385842

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

31428

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.516

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000394

AC:

AN:

152176

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000269

AC XY:

AN XY:

74334

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41442

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15274

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00115

AC:

AN:

5198

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4828

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10612

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

68032

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2090

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.492

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000151

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Xeroderma pigmentosum group A

Uncertain:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.83

CADD

Benign

1.5

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.69

PhyloP100

-0.33

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

9-97675261-T-G

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over