9-99105175-G-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_Moderate BS1_Supporting BS2

The NM_004612.4(TGFBR1):c.-31G>A variant causes a 5 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000606 in 1,088,290 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.000047 (0 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.000063 (1 hom.)
• Consequence: TGFBR1 NM_004612.4 5_prime_UTR
• Clinical Significance: Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 0.172

Genes affected

TGFBR1 (HGNC:11772): (transforming growth factor beta receptor 1) The protein encoded by this gene forms a heteromeric complex with type II TGF-beta receptors when bound to TGF-beta, transducing the TGF-beta signal from the cell surface to the cytoplasm. The encoded protein is a serine/threonine protein kinase. Mutations in this gene have been associated with Loeys-Dietz aortic aneurysm syndrome (LDAS). Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.38).
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000628 (59/938788) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00414 (58/14010). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00329. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 25 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 30. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
• BS2: High AC in GnomAd at 7 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	MANE	UniProt
TGFBR1	NM_004612.4	c.-31G>A		5_prime_UTR_variant	1/9	ENST00000374994.9

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	#exon/exons	TSL	MANE	Appris	UniProt
TGFBR1	ENST00000374994.9	c.-31G>A		5_prime_UTR_variant	1/9	1	NM_004612.4	P4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000469 AC: 7 AN: 149394 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00117

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000149

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000628 AC: 59 AN: 938788 Hom.: 1 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.0000570 AC XY: 25 AN XY: 438566

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00414

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000547

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000468 AC: 7 AN: 149502 Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000548 AC XY: 4 AN XY: 73016

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00118

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000149

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00

Bravo AF: 0.00000756

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1

Revision: criteria provided, single submitter

Submissions by phenotype

Loeys-Dietz syndrome 1 Uncertain:1

Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter

clinical testing

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Jan 13, 2018

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.38
Cadd	Benign	18
Dann	Uncertain	0.97
RBP_binding_hub_radar		1.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar		3.6

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.0		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1404137226; hg19: chr9-101867457;