9-99105217-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 2P and 11B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7
The NM_004612.4(TGFBR1):c.12G>C(p.Ala4Ala) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. A4A) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004612.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissectionInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
- Loeys-Dietz syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
- Loeys-Dietz syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, PanelApp Australia, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
- multiple self-healing squamous epitheliomaInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 30
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection Benign:2
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at