M-1619-C-T

Position:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points: 2P and 4B. PM2BP6_Strong

Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★★).

Frequency

Mitomap GenBank:
𝑓 0.0 ( AC: 2 )

Consequence

TRNV
synonymous

Scores

Mitotip
Benign
5.4

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance reviewed by expert panel U:2B:1
No linked disesase in Mitomap

Conservation

PhyloP100: -12.0
Variant links:
Genes affected

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -2 ACMG points.

PM2
Very low frequency in mitomap database: 0.0
BP6
Variant M-1619-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chrM-1619-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Uncertain_significance]. Clinvar id is 618222.Status of the report is reviewed_by_expert_panel, 3 stars. We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
TRNVunassigned_transcript_4787 use as main transcriptc.18C>T p.His6His synonymous_variant 1/1
RNR1unassigned_transcript_4786 use as main transcriptn.*18C>T downstream_gene_variant
use as main transcript

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt

Frequencies

GnomAD4 exome
Cov.:
0
We have no GnomAD4 genomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
Mitomap GenBank
AF:
0.0
AC:
2
Gnomad homoplasmic
AF:
0.000053
AC:
3
AN:
56434
Gnomad heteroplasmic
AF:
0.0
AC:
0
AN:
56434

Mitomap

No disease associated.

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:1
Revision: reviewed by expert panel
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Mitochondrial disease Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, reviewed by expert panelcurationClinGen Mitochondrial Disease Nuclear and Mitochondrial Variant Curation Expert Panel, ClinGenJun 26, 2023The m.1619C>T variant in MT-TV has been reported in one individual in the medical literature, however no clinical details are provided (PMID: 31965079). There are no reported de novo occurrences of this variant to our knowledge. There are no reports of large families with this variant segregating with disease manifestations. This variant is present in population databases (Mitomap's 3/59,389 sequences: AF=0.005%; Helix's 24/195,983 sequences: AF=0.055%; and gnomAD v3.1.2: AF=0.005% including three homoplasmic occurrences). The computational predictor MitoTIP suggests this variant is benign (15.2 percentile) and HmtVAR (score 0) predicts it to be polymorphic (BP4). There are no cybrids, single fiber studies, or other functional assays reported on this variant. In summary, this variant meets criteria to be classified as uncertain significance for primary mitochondrial disease inherited in a mitochondrial manner. This classification was approved by the NICHD/NINDS U24 ClinGen Mitochondrial Disease Variant Curation Expert Panel on June 26, 2023. Mitochondrial DNA-specific ACMG/AMP criteria applied (PMID: 32906214): BP4. -
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesJul 18, 2017This variant affects the mitochondrial tRNA for valine and has not been reported in the medical literature, is not listed in gene-specific variant databases, nor has it been previously identified in our laboratory. It is also rare in population databases such as MITOMAP (0.005% population frequency). However, the cytosine at position 1619 is weakly conserved (UCSC genome browser), suggesting this variant is evolutionary tolerated. However, based on the available information, the clinical significance of the m.1619C>T variant cannot be determined with certainty. -
MELAS syndrome Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWong Mito Lab, Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of MedicineJul 12, 2019The NC_012920.1:m.1619C>T variant in MT-TV gene is interpreted to be a Likely Benign variant based on the modified ACMG guidelines (unpublished). This variant meets the following evidence codes reported in the guidelines: BS1, BP5, BP4 -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
Mitotip
Benign
5.4
Hmtvar
Benign
0.0

Splicing

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1569483811; hg19: chrM-1621; API