X-100296285-C-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001184880.2(PCDH19):c.3439G>A(p.Val1147Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000105 in 1,202,871 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 39 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00037 ( 0 hom., 10 hem., cov: 23)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000078 ( 0 hom. 29 hem. )

Consequence

PCDH19
NM_001184880.2 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.849

Variant links:

Genes affected

PCDH19 (HGNC:14270): (protocadherin 19) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the delta-2 protocadherin subclass of the cadherin superfamily. The encoded protein is thought to be a calcium-dependent cell-adhesion protein that is primarily expressed in the brain. Mutations in this gene on human chromosome X are associated with sporadic infantile epileptic encephalopathy and to a female-restricted form of epilepsy (EFMR; also known as PCDH19RE). Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2017]

PCDH19 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.008261055).

BP6

Variant X-100296285-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-100296285-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 206288.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=4, Uncertain_significance=1}.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000366 (41/112144) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.00126 (39/30890). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000949. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 10 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 23. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Hemizygotes in GnomAd4 at 10 XL gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PCDH19	NM_001184880.2 link	c.3439G>A	p.Val1147Ile	missense_variant	Exon 6 of 6	ENST00000373034.8	NP_001171809.1	Q8TAB3-1
PCDH19	NM_001105243.2 link	c.3298G>A	p.Val1100Ile	missense_variant	Exon 5 of 5		NP_001098713.1	Q8TAB3-2B3KU71
PCDH19	NM_020766.3 link	c.3295G>A	p.Val1099Ile	missense_variant	Exon 5 of 5		NP_065817.2	Q8TAB3-3B3KU71

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PCDH19	ENST00000373034.8 link	c.3439G>A	p.Val1147Ile	missense_variant	Exon 6 of 6	1	NM_001184880.2	ENSP00000362125.4	Q8TAB3-1
PCDH19	ENST00000255531.8 link	c.3298G>A	p.Val1100Ile	missense_variant	Exon 5 of 5	1		ENSP00000255531.7	Q8TAB3-2
PCDH19	ENST00000420881.6 link	c.3295G>A	p.Val1099Ile	missense_variant	Exon 5 of 5	1		ENSP00000400327.2	Q8TAB3-3
PCDH19	ENST00000464981.1 link	n.16G>A		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 1 of 2	3		ENSP00000479805.1	A0A1Y8EN23

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000366

AC:

AN:

112092

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000292

AC XY:

AN XY:

34250

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00127

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.000282

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000188

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000121

AC:

AN:

181538

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.0000889

AC XY:

AN XY:

67488

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00153

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.000148

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.0000524

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000779

AC:

AN:

1090727

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000813

AC XY:

AN XY:

356645

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000837

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00109

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.0000185

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000335

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.0000218

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000366

AC:

AN:

112144

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000291

AC XY:

AN XY:

34312

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00126

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.000283

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.0000188

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000253

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000416

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00181

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000207

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Uncertain:1Benign:1

Jul 06, 2017

GeneDx

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Jan 20, 2016

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Benign:1

Sep 06, 2017

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

not provided

Benign:1

Aug 15, 2017

Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, 9

Benign:1

Jan 06, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.087

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.66

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.74

CADD

Benign

0.054

DANN

Uncertain

0.98

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.038

.;T;.

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.68

LIST_S2

Benign

0.78

T;T;T

M_CAP

Benign

0.0099

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0083

T;T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Benign

0.63

.;N;.

PrimateAI

Benign

0.31

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.20

N;N;N

REVEL

Benign

0.037

Sift

Benign

0.16

T;T;T

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0

D;D;D

Polyphen

0.0020, 0.010

.;B;B

Vest4

0.18

MVP

0.29

MPC

0.41

ClinPred

0.026

GERP RS

0.095

Varity_R

0.049

gMVP

0.16

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over