X-129448421-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points: 4P and 0B. PM2PP3_Moderate
The NM_001282874.2(SMARCA1):c.3053C>T(p.Thr1018Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000929 in 1,076,952 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are no hemizygote samples in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001282874.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMARCA1 | NM_001282874.2 | c.3053C>T | p.Thr1018Ile | missense_variant | 24/25 | ENST00000371121.5 | NP_001269803.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMARCA1 | ENST00000371121.5 | c.3053C>T | p.Thr1018Ile | missense_variant | 24/25 | 1 | NM_001282874.2 | ENSP00000360162.4 | ||
SMARCA1 | ENST00000371123.5 | c.3017C>T | p.Thr1006Ile | missense_variant | 23/24 | 1 | ENSP00000360164.2 | |||
SMARCA1 | ENST00000371122.8 | c.3053C>T | p.Thr1018Ile | missense_variant | 24/25 | 1 | ENSP00000360163.4 | |||
SMARCA1 | ENST00000617310.4 | n.3371C>T | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 22/23 | 2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 22
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000113 AC: 2AN: 177479Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 62821
GnomAD4 exome AF: 9.29e-7 AC: 1AN: 1076952Hom.: 0 Cov.: 26 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 344496
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 22
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Aug 25, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at