X-135906447-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_001381902.1(SAGE1):c.632T>C(p.Met211Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000729 in 1,097,184 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 3 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001381902.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAGE1 | NM_001381902.1 | c.632T>C | p.Met211Thr | missense_variant | Exon 7 of 20 | ENST00000370709.4 | NP_001368831.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAGE1 | ENST00000370709.4 | c.632T>C | p.Met211Thr | missense_variant | Exon 7 of 20 | 5 | NM_001381902.1 | ENSP00000359743.3 | ||
SAGE1 | ENST00000324447.8 | c.632T>C | p.Met211Thr | missense_variant | Exon 7 of 20 | 5 | ENSP00000323191.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 28
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000729 AC: 8AN: 1097184Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000827 AC XY: 3AN XY: 362586
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 28
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
The c.632T>C (p.M211T) alteration is located in exon 7 (coding exon 6) of the SAGE1 gene. This alteration results from a T to C substitution at nucleotide position 632, causing the methionine (M) at amino acid position 211 to be replaced by a threonine (T). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at