Genetic Variant SLC6A8:c.644+9G>C (chrX-153691562-G-C) – ACMG Classification: Benign (-10 pts)

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6_ModerateBS2

The NM_005629.4(SLC6A8):c.644+9G>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000157 in 1,209,866 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. There are 3 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000071 ( 0 hom., 1 hem., cov: 24)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000010 ( 1 hom. 2 hem. )

Consequence

SLC6A8
NM_005629.4 intron

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, single submitter B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0680

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

SLC6A8 (HGNC:11055): (solute carrier family 6 member 8) The protein encoded by this gene is a plasma membrane protein whose function is to transport creatine into and out of cells. Defects in this gene can result in X-linked creatine deficiency syndrome. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2008]

SLC6A8 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

creatine transporter deficiency
Inheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, PanelApp Australia, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Orphanet

SLC6A8 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.61).

BP6

Variant X-153691562-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-153691562-G-C is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 702153.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.

BS2

High Hemizygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 XL gene

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_005629.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
SLC6A8	NM_005629.4	MANE Select	c.644+9G>C	intron	N/A	NP_005620.1	P48029-1
SLC6A8	NM_001142805.2		c.644+9G>C	intron	N/A	NP_001136277.1
SLC6A8	NM_001142806.1		c.299+9G>C	intron	N/A	NP_001136278.1	P48029-4

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
SLC6A8	ENST00000253122.10	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.644+9G>C	intron	N/A	ENSP00000253122.5	P48029-1
SLC6A8	ENST00000955775.1		c.644+9G>C	intron	N/A	ENSP00000625834.1
SLC6A8	ENST00000922630.1		c.644+9G>C	intron	N/A	ENSP00000592689.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000706

AC:

AN:

113309

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000256

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000222

AC:

AN:

180354

AF XY:

0.00

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000309

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000100

AC:

AN:

1096557

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00000552

AC XY:

AN XY:

362545

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000417

AC:

AN:

26377

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

35187

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

19367

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

30198

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

54103

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39937

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3916

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

841439

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

46033

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.425

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000706

AC:

AN:

113309

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000282

AC XY:

AN XY:

35461

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000256

AC:

AN:

31232

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10856

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2654

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3600

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2829

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

6358

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

240

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53321

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

1533

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.475

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.00

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000113

ClinVar

ClinVar submissions

Significance:Likely benign

Revision:criteria provided, single submitter

View on ClinVar

Pathogenic

VUS

Benign

Condition

Creatine transporter deficiency (1)

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.61

CADD

Benign

3.2

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.73

PhyloP100

-0.068

PromoterAI

0.0080

Neutral

(source)

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.2

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over