X-154349836-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_001110556.2(FLNA):āc.7365C>Gā(p.Ser2455Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000479 in 1,210,077 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 18 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001110556.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000887 AC: 10AN: 112771Hom.: 0 Cov.: 26 AF XY: 0.000172 AC XY: 6AN XY: 34909
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000833 AC: 15AN: 180178Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000600 AC XY: 4AN XY: 66670
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000437 AC: 48AN: 1097306Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000331 AC XY: 12AN XY: 362978
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000887 AC: 10AN: 112771Hom.: 0 Cov.: 26 AF XY: 0.000172 AC XY: 6AN XY: 34909
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Feb 15, 2018 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Melnick-Needles syndrome;C0265293:Frontometaphyseal dysplasia;C1844696:Oto-palato-digital syndrome, type II;C1848213:Heterotopia, periventricular, X-linked dominant Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Dec 02, 2023 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at