X-154365129-G-T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_001110556.2(FLNA):c.1691+7C>A variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000374 in 1,209,958 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 151 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00029 ( 0 hom., 11 hem., cov: 24)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00038 ( 0 hom. 140 hem. )

Consequence

FLNA
NM_001110556.2 splice_region, intron

Scores

Splicing: ADA: 0.00001276

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.274

Variant links:

Genes affected

FLNA (HGNC:3754): (filamin A) The protein encoded by this gene is an actin-binding protein that crosslinks actin filaments and links actin filaments to membrane glycoproteins. The encoded protein is involved in remodeling the cytoskeleton to effect changes in cell shape and migration. This protein interacts with integrins, transmembrane receptor complexes, and second messengers. Defects in this gene are a cause of several syndromes, including periventricular nodular heterotopias (PVNH1, PVNH4), otopalatodigital syndromes (OPD1, OPD2), frontometaphyseal dysplasia (FMD), Melnick-Needles syndrome (MNS), and X-linked congenital idiopathic intestinal pseudoobstruction (CIIPX). Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, Mar 2009]

FLNA links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.9).

BP6

Variant X-154365129-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-154365129-G-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 129066.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=2, Benign=2, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chrX-154365129-G-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000294 (33/112411) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.000546 (29/53114). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000391. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 11 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 24. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High Hemizygotes in GnomAd4 at 11 XL gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
FLNA	NM_001110556.2 link	c.1691+7C>A		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 11 of 47	ENST00000369850.10	NP_001104026.1	P21333-1Q60FE5Q6NXF2
FLNA	NM_001456.4 link	c.1691+7C>A		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 11 of 46		NP_001447.2	P21333-2Q60FE5Q6NXF2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
FLNA	ENST00000369850.10 link	c.1691+7C>A		splice_region_variant, intron_variant	Intron 11 of 47	1	NM_001110556.2	ENSP00000358866.3		P21333-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000294

AC:

AN:

112411

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000318

AC XY:

AN XY:

34577

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000129

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000546

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000242

AC:

AN:

181544

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000237

AC XY:

AN XY:

67540

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000256

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000443

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000224

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000382

AC:

419

AN:

1097547

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000386

AC XY:

140

AN XY:

363105

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000152

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.000284

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.000473

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000152

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000294

AC:

AN:

112411

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000318

AC XY:

AN XY:

34577

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000129

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000546

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000654

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000283

EpiCase

AF:

0.000273

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:6

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:2Benign:3

Mar 25, 2013

Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 09, 2021

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 26, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Uncertain significance

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified

Benign:1

Apr 17, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Melnick-Needles syndrome;C0265293:Frontometaphyseal dysplasia;C1844696:Oto-palato-digital syndrome, type II;C1848213:Heterotopia, periventricular, X-linked dominant

Benign:1

Jan 23, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Connective tissue disorder

Benign:1

Nov 01, 2016

Center for Human Genetics, Inc, Center for Human Genetics, Inc

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.90

CADD

Benign

3.0

DANN

Benign

0.41

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

dbscSNV1_ADA

Benign

0.000013

dbscSNV1_RF

Benign

0.0

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over