X-154379496-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_000117.3(EMD):c.12C>T(p.Tyr4Tyr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000437 in 1,168,059 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 19 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000117.3 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000528 AC: 6AN: 113604Hom.: 0 Cov.: 26 AF XY: 0.0000559 AC XY: 2AN XY: 35748
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000173 AC: 2AN: 115306Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000253 AC XY: 1AN XY: 39596
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000417 AC: 44AN: 1054407Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000464 AC XY: 16AN XY: 344827
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000616 AC: 7AN: 113652Hom.: 0 Cov.: 26 AF XY: 0.0000838 AC XY: 3AN XY: 35806
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
- -
- -
Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy Benign:1
- -
Cardiomyopathy Benign:1
- -
X-linked Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy Benign:1
- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
EMD-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at