X-16841458-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_018360.3(TXLNG):c.1279C>T(p.Leu427Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000182 in 1,097,488 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 2 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L427V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018360.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- spermatogenic failure, X-linked, 9Inheritance: XL Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_018360.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TXLNG | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1279C>T | p.Leu427Phe | missense | Exon 10 of 10 | ENSP00000369465.5 | Q9NUQ3-1 | ||
| TXLNG | TSL:1 | c.883C>T | p.Leu295Phe | missense | Exon 8 of 8 | ENSP00000381222.4 | Q9NUQ3-2 | ||
| TXLNG | c.1264C>T | p.Leu422Phe | missense | Exon 10 of 10 | ENSP00000589156.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 23
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000551 AC: 1AN: 181596 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000182 AC: 2AN: 1097488Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000551 AC XY: 2AN XY: 362958 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 23
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at