X-20016108-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_001168465.2(MAP7D2):c.1630A>G(p.Met544Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000274 in 1,096,359 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 2 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001168465.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -6 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAP7D2 | ENST00000379643.10 | c.1630A>G | p.Met544Val | missense_variant | Exon 11 of 17 | 1 | NM_001168465.2 | ENSP00000368964.5 | ||
MAP7D2 | ENST00000379651.7 | c.1507A>G | p.Met503Val | missense_variant | Exon 10 of 16 | 1 | ENSP00000368972.3 | |||
MAP7D2 | ENST00000443379.7 | c.1372A>G | p.Met458Val | missense_variant | Exon 9 of 15 | 2 | ENSP00000388239.3 | |||
MAP7D2 | ENST00000452324.3 | c.1351A>G | p.Met451Val | missense_variant | Exon 10 of 16 | 2 | ENSP00000413301.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 24
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000274 AC: 3AN: 1096359Hom.: 0 Cov.: 30 AF XY: 0.00000553 AC XY: 2AN XY: 361821
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 24
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
The c.1630A>G (p.M544V) alteration is located in exon 11 (coding exon 11) of the MAP7D2 gene. This alteration results from a A to G substitution at nucleotide position 1630, causing the methionine (M) at amino acid position 544 to be replaced by a valine (V). Based on insufficient or conflicting evidence, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at