X-31968490-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_004006.3(DMD):c.6463C>T(p.Arg2155Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0367 in 1,208,510 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 655 homozygotes. There are 14,143 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 11/17 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R2155Q) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004006.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMD | NM_004006.3 | c.6463C>T | p.Arg2155Trp | missense_variant | 45/79 | ENST00000357033.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMD | ENST00000357033.9 | c.6463C>T | p.Arg2155Trp | missense_variant | 45/79 | 1 | NM_004006.3 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0271 AC: 3020AN: 111598Hom.: 40 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.0251 AC XY: 851AN XY: 33888
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0261 AC: 4756AN: 182171Hom.: 64 AF XY: 0.0266 AC XY: 1787AN XY: 67147
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0377 AC: 41356AN: 1096861Hom.: 615 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0366 AC XY: 13292AN XY: 362857
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0270 AC: 3018AN: 111649Hom.: 40 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.0251 AC XY: 851AN XY: 33949
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:8
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jun 10, 2014 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 11, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 04, 2019 | Variant summary: DMD c.6463C>T (p.Arg2155Trp) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.026 in 199100 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 80 homozygotes and 1967 hemizygotes, which is significantly over the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in DMD causing Dystrophinopathies phenotype (0.000008824), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. Five ClinVar submissions from clinical diagnostic laboratories (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as likely benign/benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Oct 29, 2014 | p.Arg2155Trp in exon 45 of DMD: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 3.8% (254/6725) of European America n chromosomes by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.ed u/EVS/; dbSNP rs1800273). - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 01, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Duchenne muscular dystrophy;C0917713:Becker muscular dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | May 31, 2017 | - - |
Duchenne muscular dystrophy;C0878544:Cardiomyopathy;C0917713:Becker muscular dystrophy;na:Dystrophin deficiency Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Mar 28, 2017 | - - |
Dilated cardiomyopathy 3B Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jun 29, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Duchenne muscular dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at