X-32411823-A-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_004006.3(DMD):āc.4162T>Gā(p.Phe1388Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00498 in 1,208,952 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 158 homozygotes. There are 1,659 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/17 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_004006.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMD | NM_004006.3 | c.4162T>G | p.Phe1388Val | missense_variant | 30/79 | ENST00000357033.9 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMD | ENST00000357033.9 | c.4162T>G | p.Phe1388Val | missense_variant | 30/79 | 1 | NM_004006.3 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0256 AC: 2846AN: 111321Hom.: 89 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.0227 AC XY: 762AN XY: 33519
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00767 AC: 1403AN: 182914Hom.: 33 AF XY: 0.00539 AC XY: 364AN XY: 67584
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00287 AC: 3153AN: 1097580Hom.: 69 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00243 AC XY: 882AN XY: 363016
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0257 AC: 2864AN: 111372Hom.: 89 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.0231 AC XY: 777AN XY: 33580
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:8
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | Jan 25, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jan 09, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine | Jan 13, 2015 | p.Phe1388Val in exon 30 of DMD: This variant is not expected to have clinical si gnificance because it has been identified in 9% (345/3833) of African American c hromosomes by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/E VS/; dbSNP rs28715870). - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Mar 30, 2020 | Variant summary: DMD c.4162T>G (p.Phe1388Val) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Four of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0077 in 182914 control chromosomes in the gnomAD database, including 33 homozygotes and 364 hemizygotes. The observed variant frequency is approximately 695 fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in DMD causing Dystrophinopathies phenotype (1.1e-05), strongly suggesting that the variant is benign. Seven clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar after 2014 without evidence for independent evaluation. All laboratories classified the variant as benign/likely benign. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as benign. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Athena Diagnostics | Jan 12, 2021 | - - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
not provided Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics | Jun 04, 2015 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Apr 24, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Duchenne muscular dystrophy;C0878544:Cardiomyopathy;C0917713:Becker muscular dystrophy;na:Dystrophin deficiency Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Apr 21, 2017 | - - |
Dilated cardiomyopathy 3B Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Duchenne muscular dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 15, 2016 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at