X-32644238-T-A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_004006.3(DMD):​c.1225A>T​(p.Thr409Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00193 in 1,209,415 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 26 homozygotes. There are 610 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/17 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T409A) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0098 ( 13 hom., 279 hem., cov: 23)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0011 ( 13 hom. 331 hem. )

Consequence

DMD
NM_004006.3 missense

Scores

15

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.0270
Variant links:
Genes affected
DMD (HGNC:2928): (dystrophin) This gene spans a genomic range of greater than 2 Mb and encodes a large protein containing an N-terminal actin-binding domain and multiple spectrin repeats. The encoded protein forms a component of the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex (DGC), which bridges the inner cytoskeleton and the extracellular matrix. Deletions, duplications, and point mutations at this gene locus may cause Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD), or cardiomyopathy. Alternative promoter usage and alternative splicing result in numerous distinct transcript variants and protein isoforms for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2016]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.0040003657).
BP6
Variant X-32644238-T-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chrX-32644238-T-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 94453.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chrX-32644238-T-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign]. Variant chrX-32644238-T-A is described in Lovd as [Benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00981 (1097/111812) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0341 (1048/30729). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0324. There are 13 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 279 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 23. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 13 XL gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE UniProt
DMDNM_004006.3 linkuse as main transcriptc.1225A>T p.Thr409Ser missense_variant 11/79 ENST00000357033.9

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Appris UniProt
DMDENST00000357033.9 linkuse as main transcriptc.1225A>T p.Thr409Ser missense_variant 11/791 NM_004006.3 P4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00982
AC:
1097
AN:
111757
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
23
AF XY:
0.00816
AC XY:
277
AN XY:
33941
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0342
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00305
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000373
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00422
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000113
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00597
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00312
AC:
571
AN:
183163
Hom.:
3
AF XY:
0.00176
AC XY:
119
AN XY:
67675
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0382
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00226
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000367
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000663
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00113
AC:
1237
AN:
1097603
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000912
AC XY:
331
AN XY:
363035
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0365
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00230
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000369
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000772
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00258
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00981
AC:
1097
AN:
111812
Hom.:
13
Cov.:
23
AF XY:
0.00820
AC XY:
279
AN XY:
34006
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0341
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00305
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000374
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.000113
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00590
Alfa
AF:
0.00181
Hom.:
35
Bravo
AF:
0.0122
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.0365
AC:
140
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.00338
AC:
410
EpiCase
AF:
0.000218
EpiControl
AF:
0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLaboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized MedicineJan 13, 2015p.Thr409Ser in exon 11 of DMD: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 3.7% (140/3833) of African American chromosomes by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/ EVS/; dbSNP rs34155804). -
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingWomen's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorpApr 10, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingEurofins Ntd Llc (ga)Dec 16, 2015- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxMar 24, 2014This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingPreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences-- -
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP LaboratoriesNov 29, 2023- -
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAthena DiagnosticsOct 22, 2018- -
Duchenne muscular dystrophy;C0878544:Cardiomyopathy;C0917713:Becker muscular dystrophy;na:Dystrophin deficiency Benign:1
Likely benign, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Apr 20, 2017- -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 3B Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingIllumina Laboratory Services, IlluminaJan 13, 2018This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingCenter for Advanced Laboratory Medicine, UC San Diego Health, University of California San DiegoJun 03, 2019- -
Duchenne muscular dystrophy Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpJan 31, 2024- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsNov 12, 2015This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.077
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.86
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.98
CADD
Benign
4.8
DANN
Benign
0.96
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.20
.;T;.;.;T
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.12
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.38
T;.;T;T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0040
T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-1.1
T
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
P;P;P
PrimateAI
Benign
0.28
T
PROVEAN
Benign
0.24
.;N;.;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.027
Sift
Benign
0.17
.;T;.;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.48
T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0, 0.0010
.;B;.;.;B
Vest4
0.17
MVP
0.46
MPC
0.016
ClinPred
0.0016
T
GERP RS
0.29
gMVP
0.071

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs34155804; hg19: chrX-32662355; API