X-40605570-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_005765.3(ATP6AP2):āc.868G>Cā(p.Ala290Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00348 in 1,202,773 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 94 homozygotes. There are 1,076 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/17 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005765.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATP6AP2 | NM_005765.3 | c.868G>C | p.Ala290Pro | missense_variant | 9/9 | ENST00000636580.2 | NP_005756.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATP6AP2 | ENST00000636580.2 | c.868G>C | p.Ala290Pro | missense_variant | 9/9 | 1 | NM_005765.3 | ENSP00000490083 | P3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0185 AC: 2067AN: 111919Hom.: 47 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.0159 AC XY: 541AN XY: 34113
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00532 AC: 968AN: 181960Hom.: 21 AF XY: 0.00349 AC XY: 233AN XY: 66788
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00194 AC: 2112AN: 1090803Hom.: 47 Cov.: 29 AF XY: 0.00149 AC XY: 534AN XY: 357479
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0185 AC: 2069AN: 111970Hom.: 47 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.0159 AC XY: 542AN XY: 34174
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | May 03, 2012 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | - | Likely benign based on allele frequency in 1000 Genomes Project or ESP global frequency and its presence in a patient with a rare or unrelated disease phenotype. NOT Sanger confirmed. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht | - | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Likely benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) | - | - - |
Syndromic X-linked intellectual disability Hedera type Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Inborn genetic diseases Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Jul 16, 2015 | This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at