X-48700340-C-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_003173.4(SUV39H1):c.415C>T(p.Arg139Cys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000413 in 1,210,748 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are no hemizygote samples in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_003173.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 0 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUV39H1 | NM_003173.4 | c.415C>T | p.Arg139Cys | missense_variant | 3/6 | ENST00000376687.4 | NP_003164.1 | |
SUV39H1 | NM_001282166.2 | c.448C>T | p.Arg150Cys | missense_variant | 3/6 | NP_001269095.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SUV39H1 | ENST00000376687.4 | c.415C>T | p.Arg139Cys | missense_variant | 3/6 | 1 | NM_003173.4 | ENSP00000365877.4 | ||
SUV39H1 | ENST00000337852.10 | c.448C>T | p.Arg150Cys | missense_variant | 3/6 | 2 | ENSP00000337976.6 | |||
ENSG00000232828 | ENST00000416061.1 | n.491G>A | non_coding_transcript_exon_variant | 2/3 | 3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000266 AC: 3AN: 112629Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 34773
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000182 AC: 2AN: 1098119Hom.: 0 Cov.: 34 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 363481
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000266 AC: 3AN: 112629Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 34773
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Ependymoma Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria provided | research | McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University in St. Louis | Dec 29, 2017 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at