X-48902015-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BS2
The NM_001032382.2(PQBP1):c.265G>A(p.Ala89Thr) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000137 in 1,098,211 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 3 hemizygotes in GnomAD. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A89V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001032382.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Renpenning syndromeInheritance: XL Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics, G2P, ClinGen
- hamel cerebro-palato-cardiac syndromeInheritance: XL Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- X-linked intellectual disability, Golabi-Ito-hall typeInheritance: XL Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- X-linked intellectual disability, Porteous typeInheritance: XL Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- X-linked intellectual disability, Sutherland-Haan typeInheritance: XL Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PQBP1 | NM_001032382.2 | c.265G>A | p.Ala89Thr | missense_variant | Exon 4 of 7 | ENST00000447146.7 | NP_001027554.1 |
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 22
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000545 AC: 1AN: 183459 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000137 AC: 15AN: 1098211Hom.: 0 Cov.: 35 AF XY: 0.00000825 AC XY: 3AN XY: 363565 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 22
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at