X-55013526-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2
The NM_000032.5(ALAS2):c.1560C>A(p.Pro520Pro) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00386 in 1,209,514 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 13 homozygotes. There are 1,518 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000032.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -14 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALAS2 | NM_000032.5 | c.1560C>A | p.Pro520Pro | synonymous_variant | 10/11 | ENST00000650242.1 | NP_000023.2 | |
ALAS2 | NM_001037968.4 | c.1521C>A | p.Pro507Pro | synonymous_variant | 10/11 | NP_001033057.1 | ||
ALAS2 | NM_001037967.4 | c.1449C>A | p.Pro483Pro | synonymous_variant | 9/10 | NP_001033056.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALAS2 | ENST00000650242.1 | c.1560C>A | p.Pro520Pro | synonymous_variant | 10/11 | NM_000032.5 | ENSP00000497236.1 | |||
ALAS2 | ENST00000396198.7 | c.1521C>A | p.Pro507Pro | synonymous_variant | 10/11 | 5 | ENSP00000379501.3 | |||
ALAS2 | ENST00000335854.8 | c.1449C>A | p.Pro483Pro | synonymous_variant | 9/10 | 2 | ENSP00000337131.4 | |||
ALAS2 | ENST00000498636.1 | c.726+1221C>A | intron_variant | 3 | ENSP00000495662.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00367 AC: 409AN: 111544Hom.: 1 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.00383 AC XY: 129AN XY: 33702
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00365 AC: 666AN: 182616Hom.: 1 AF XY: 0.00359 AC XY: 241AN XY: 67168
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00388 AC: 4261AN: 1097916Hom.: 12 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00382 AC XY: 1389AN XY: 363284
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00366 AC: 409AN: 111598Hom.: 1 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.00382 AC XY: 129AN XY: 33766
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 29, 2024 | - - |
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen | May 01, 2016 | - - |
not specified Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Jun 09, 2014 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Nov 25, 2018 | - - |
X-linked sideroblastic anemia 1 Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genome-Nilou Lab | May 18, 2021 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at