X-64917821-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 15 ACMG points: 15P and 0B. PS1_ModeratePM1PM2PP3PP5_Very_Strong
The NM_018684.4(ZC4H2):c.637C>T(p.Arg213Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Pathogenic (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely pathogenicin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_018684.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Pathogenic. Variant got 15 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZC4H2 | NM_018684.4 | c.637C>T | p.Arg213Trp | missense_variant | 5/5 | ENST00000374839.8 | NP_061154.1 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZC4H2 | ENST00000374839.8 | c.637C>T | p.Arg213Trp | missense_variant | 5/5 | 1 | NM_018684.4 | ENSP00000363972 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 23
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 30
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 23
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Pathogenic:2
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jul 06, 2017 | This variant is not present in population databases (ExAC no frequency). For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Pathogenic. Experimental studies have shown that this missense change is unable to rescue the phenotype in a zebrafish knockout model (PMID: 26056227). This variant has been reported to segregate with disease in two families affected with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita and intellectual disability (PMID: 23623388) and another family affected with intellectual disability, contractures, and spasticity (PMID: 26056227). ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 50983). This sequence change replaces arginine with tryptophan at codon 213 of the ZC4H2 protein (p.Arg213Trp). The arginine residue is highly conserved and there is a moderate physicochemical difference between arginine and tryptophan. - |
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Dec 10, 2021 | Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (gnomAD); In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 23623388, 26056227, 28345801, 29150902, 33504798, 33739554, 31206972) - |
Inborn genetic diseases Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 14, 2022 | The c.637C>T (p.R213W) alteration is located in exon 5 (coding exon 5) of the ZC4H2 gene. This alteration results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 637, causing the arginine (R) at amino acid position 213 to be replaced by a tryptophan (W). This variant was not reported in population-based cohorts in the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). This variant co-segregated in multiple families in individuals with ZC4H2-related disorder (Hirata, 2013; May, 2015). This variant has been determined to be the result of a de novo mutation in an individual with ZC4H2-related disorder (Frints, 2019). This amino acid position is highly conserved in available vertebrate species. This alteration is predicted to disrupt the nuclear localization signal motif (Ambry internal data; Hirata, 2013; May, 2015) and has been determined to impact protein function (Hirata, 2013; May, 2015; Ma, 2017) This alteration is predicted to be deleterious by in silico analysis. Based on the available evidence, this alteration is classified as pathogenic. - |
Wieacker-Wolff syndrome Pathogenic:1
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | May 02, 2013 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at