X-80728838-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 1P and 11B. PP2BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2
The NM_153252.5(BRWD3):āc.1300T>Cā(p.Tyr434His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000274 in 1,204,266 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 9 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_153252.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRWD3 | NM_153252.5 | c.1300T>C | p.Tyr434His | missense_variant | 14/41 | ENST00000373275.5 | NP_694984.5 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRWD3 | ENST00000373275.5 | c.1300T>C | p.Tyr434His | missense_variant | 14/41 | 1 | NM_153252.5 | ENSP00000362372.4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000179 AC: 2AN: 111941Hom.: 0 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 34151
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000219 AC: 4AN: 183046Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000444 AC XY: 3AN XY: 67614
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000284 AC: 31AN: 1092273Hom.: 0 Cov.: 28 AF XY: 0.0000251 AC XY: 9AN XY: 358089
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000179 AC: 2AN: 111993Hom.: 0 Cov.: 22 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 34213
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Inborn genetic diseases Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | May 19, 2016 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago | Jun 27, 2016 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at