X-81119798-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_StrongBS2
The NM_030763.3(HMGN5):c.35T>C(p.Met12Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000623 in 1,204,768 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. There are 22 hemizygotes in GnomAD. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. M12V) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_030763.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_030763.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HMGN5 | TSL:2 MANE Select | c.35T>C | p.Met12Thr | missense | Exon 3 of 7 | ENSP00000350848.2 | P82970 | ||
| HMGN5 | TSL:1 | c.35T>C | p.Met12Thr | missense | Exon 2 of 6 | ENSP00000399626.1 | Q5JSL0 | ||
| HMGN5 | c.35T>C | p.Met12Thr | missense | Exon 2 of 7 | ENSP00000586890.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000340 AC: 38AN: 111918Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000109 AC: 20AN: 182740 AF XY: 0.0000744 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000339 AC: 37AN: 1092799Hom.: 0 Cov.: 27 AF XY: 0.0000335 AC XY: 12AN XY: 358393 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000339 AC: 38AN: 111969Hom.: 0 Cov.: 23 AF XY: 0.000293 AC XY: 10AN XY: 34149 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at