chr1-231272345-A-G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_014236.4(GNPAT):āc.1556A>Gā(p.Asp519Gly) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.194 in 1,586,152 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 32,140 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (ā ā ).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_014236.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNPAT | NM_014236.4 | c.1556A>G | p.Asp519Gly | missense_variant | 11/16 | ENST00000366647.9 | |
GNPAT | NM_001316350.2 | c.1373A>G | p.Asp458Gly | missense_variant | 10/15 | ||
GNPAT | XM_005273313.5 | c.1553A>G | p.Asp518Gly | missense_variant | 11/16 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNPAT | ENST00000366647.9 | c.1556A>G | p.Asp519Gly | missense_variant | 11/16 | 1 | NM_014236.4 | P1 | |
GNPAT | ENST00000416000.1 | c.1526A>G | p.Asp509Gly | missense_variant | 11/13 | 5 | |||
GNPAT | ENST00000644483.1 | c.*1242A>G | 3_prime_UTR_variant, NMD_transcript_variant | 12/17 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.160 AC: 24361AN: 152082Hom.: 2241 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.163 AC: 41038AN: 251422Hom.: 3656 AF XY: 0.168 AC XY: 22891AN XY: 135878
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.197 AC: 282758AN: 1433952Hom.: 29899 Cov.: 25 AF XY: 0.197 AC XY: 140778AN XY: 714988
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.160 AC: 24369AN: 152200Hom.: 2241 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.152 AC XY: 11348AN XY: 74430
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Rhizomelic chondrodysplasia punctata type 2 Pathogenic:1Benign:4
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories | Nov 29, 2023 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 12, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Mendelics | May 28, 2019 | - - |
Pathogenic, no assertion criteria provided | literature only | OMIM | May 01, 1998 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics | Apr 26, 2022 | - - |
not specified Benign:3
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Mar 22, 2016 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Mar 21, 2016 | This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Dec 03, 2021 | - - |
not provided Benign:2
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic | Sep 27, 2017 | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Feb 01, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at