chr1-58539094-G-T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_145243.5(OMA1):c.201C>A(p.Asn67Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00791 in 872,778 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 300 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 12/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_145243.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMA1 | NM_145243.5 | c.201C>A | p.Asn67Lys | missense_variant | 2/9 | ENST00000371226.8 | |
DAB1 | NM_001379461.1 | c.-730+7609C>A | intron_variant |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OMA1 | ENST00000371226.8 | c.201C>A | p.Asn67Lys | missense_variant | 2/9 | 1 | NM_145243.5 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0280 AC: 4254AN: 152040Hom.: 188 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00723 AC: 1815AN: 251162Hom.: 74 AF XY: 0.00501 AC XY: 681AN XY: 135806
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00366 AC: 2639AN: 720620Hom.: 110 Cov.: 0 AF XY: 0.00301 AC XY: 1158AN XY: 384658
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0280 AC: 4266AN: 152158Hom.: 190 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0273 AC XY: 2032AN XY: 74418
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | not provided | Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics | - | - - |
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jun 10, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at