chr10-116089842-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BA1
The NM_005264.8(GFRA1):āc.1096A>Gā(p.Thr366Ala) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0936 in 1,613,376 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7,578 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (no stars). Another nucleotide change resulting in same amino acid change has been previously reported as Likely benignin UniProt.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_005264.8 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFRA1 | NM_005264.8 | c.1096A>G | p.Thr366Ala | missense_variant | 9/11 | ENST00000355422.11 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFRA1 | ENST00000355422.11 | c.1096A>G | p.Thr366Ala | missense_variant | 9/11 | 5 | NM_005264.8 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0941 AC: 14309AN: 152040Hom.: 703 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.104 AC: 26244AN: 251218Hom.: 1516 AF XY: 0.104 AC XY: 14157AN XY: 135784
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0935 AC: 136671AN: 1461216Hom.: 6874 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0950 AC XY: 69038AN XY: 726944
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0941 AC: 14318AN: 152160Hom.: 704 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0956 AC XY: 7112AN XY: 74388
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
GFRA1-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Oct 21, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at