chr11-61392636-T-C
Position:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM1BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_001173990.3(TMEM216):āc.5T>Cā(p.Leu2Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000485 in 1,534,858 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 10 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Genomes: š 0.00022 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š: 0.00051 ( 9 hom. )
Consequence
TMEM216
NM_001173990.3 missense
NM_001173990.3 missense
Scores
5
13
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: 1.91
Genes affected
TMEM216 (HGNC:25018): (transmembrane protein 216) This locus encodes a transmembrane domain-containing protein. Mutations at this locus have been associated with Meckel-Gruber Syndrome Type 2, and Joubert Syndrome 2, also known as Cerebello-oculorenal Syndrome 2. [provided by RefSeq, Aug 2010]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.
PM1
In a chain Transmembrane protein 216 (size 144) in uniprot entity TM216_HUMAN there are 7 pathogenic changes around while only 1 benign (88%) in NM_001173990.3
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009251386).
BP6
Variant 11-61392636-T-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-61392636-T-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 193189.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2}. Variant chr11-61392636-T-C is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population sas. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000223 (34/152242) while in subpopulation SAS AF= 0.00706 (34/4814). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00519. There are 1 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 26 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 9 AR gene
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMEM216 | NM_001173990.3 | c.5T>C | p.Leu2Pro | missense_variant | 1/5 | ENST00000515837.7 | NP_001167461.1 | |
TMEM216 | NM_001173991.3 | c.5T>C | p.Leu2Pro | missense_variant | 1/5 | NP_001167462.1 | ||
TMEM216 | NM_001330285.2 | c.-193T>C | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/5 | NP_001317214.1 | |||
TMEM216 | NM_016499.6 | c.-193T>C | 5_prime_UTR_variant | 1/5 | NP_057583.2 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMEM216 | ENST00000515837.7 | c.5T>C | p.Leu2Pro | missense_variant | 1/5 | 2 | NM_001173990.3 | ENSP00000440638 | P4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000230 AC: 35AN: 152124Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
35
AN:
152124
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00138 AC: 186AN: 134574Hom.: 3 AF XY: 0.00182 AC XY: 133AN XY: 73264
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
AC:
186
AN:
134574
Hom.:
AF XY:
AC XY:
133
AN XY:
73264
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000514 AC: 711AN: 1382616Hom.: 9 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000715 AC XY: 488AN XY: 682300
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
AC:
711
AN:
1382616
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
488
AN XY:
682300
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000223 AC: 34AN: 152242Hom.: 1 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000349 AC XY: 26AN XY: 74444
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
34
AN:
152242
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
26
AN XY:
74444
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
ExAC
AF:
AC:
57
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
7
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
Joubert syndrome 2 Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. - |
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | Natera, Inc. | Apr 14, 2020 | - - |
Meckel syndrome, type 2 Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina | Jan 13, 2018 | This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. - |
not provided Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga) | May 21, 2014 | - - |
TMEM216-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, no assertion criteria provided | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Aug 28, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
Familial aplasia of the vermis Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Jan 27, 2024 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
CADD
Benign
DANN
Uncertain
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;.
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
D
LIST_S2
Benign
T;T
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
N;N
MutationTaster
Benign
D;D;D
PrimateAI
Uncertain
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
Sift
Benign
T;T
Sift4G
Uncertain
D;D
Vest4
MutPred
Loss of stability (P = 0.0026);Loss of stability (P = 0.0026);
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at