chr13-32339572-T-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_Strong
The NM_000059.4(BRCA2):c.5217T>C(p.Tyr1739=) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000621 in 1,609,076 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. YL1739Y?) has been classified as Pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000059.4 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | NM_000059.4 | c.5217T>C | p.Tyr1739= | synonymous_variant | 11/27 | ENST00000380152.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRCA2 | ENST00000380152.8 | c.5217T>C | p.Tyr1739= | synonymous_variant | 11/27 | 5 | NM_000059.4 | A2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152200Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000402 AC: 1AN: 248780Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000743 AC XY: 1AN XY: 134618
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000618 AC: 9AN: 1456876Hom.: 0 Cov.: 44 AF XY: 0.00000552 AC XY: 4AN XY: 724892
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152200Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74360
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Breast-ovarian cancer, familial, susceptibility to, 2 Benign:4
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center | Jul 07, 2023 | - - |
Likely benign, reviewed by expert panel | curation | Evidence-based Network for the Interpretation of Germline Mutant Alleles (ENIGMA) | Jun 29, 2017 | Synonymous substitution variant, with low bioinformatic likelihood to result in a splicing aberration (Splicing prior probability 0.02; http://priors.hci.utah.edu/PRIORS/). - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Counsyl | Oct 26, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health | Dec 15, 2023 | - - |
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health | Dec 12, 2016 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Sep 12, 2014 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Benign:2
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | National Health Laboratory Service, Universitas Academic Hospital and University of the Free State | Nov 16, 2021 | - - |
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp | Nov 14, 2023 | - - |
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp | Aug 21, 2019 | - - |
Breast and/or ovarian cancer Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario | Sep 26, 2022 | - - |
not provided Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | GeneDx | Oct 15, 2018 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at