chr15-90749983-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM2BP4_ModerateBS1_Supporting

The NM_000057.4(BLM):ā€‹c.715G>Cā€‹(p.Asp239His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000477 in 1,614,202 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (ā˜…ā˜…). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D239N) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.000026 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.000050 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

BLM
NM_000057.4 missense

Scores

4
15

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.43
Variant links:
Genes affected
BLM (HGNC:1058): (BLM RecQ like helicase) The Bloom syndrome is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by growth deficiency, microcephaly and immunodeficiency among others. It is caused by homozygous or compound heterozygous mutation in the gene encoding DNA helicase RecQ protein on chromosome 15q26. This Bloom-associated helicase unwinds a variety of DNA substrates including Holliday junction, and is involved in several pathways contributing to the maintenance of genome stability. Identification of pathogenic Bloom variants is required for heterozygote testing in at-risk families. [provided by RefSeq, May 2020]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.12342304).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. gnomad4_exome allele frequency = 0.0000499 (73/1461880) while in subpopulation EAS AF= 0.00181 (72/39696). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00148. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4_exome. There are 43 alleles in male gnomad4_exome subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position pass quality control queck. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
BLMNM_000057.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.715G>C p.Asp239His missense_variant 3/22 ENST00000355112.8 NP_000048.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
BLMENST00000355112.8 linkuse as main transcriptc.715G>C p.Asp239His missense_variant 3/221 NM_000057.4 ENSP00000347232 P2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000263
AC:
4
AN:
152204
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000576
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000199
AC:
5
AN:
251016
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000221
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
135756
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000272
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000499
AC:
73
AN:
1461880
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000591
AC XY:
43
AN XY:
727242
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00181
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000166
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000263
AC:
4
AN:
152322
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000269
AC XY:
2
AN XY:
74474
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000240
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.000578
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Bravo
AF:
0.0000189
ExAC
AF:
0.0000330
AC:
4

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:4
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Bloom syndrome Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, no assertion criteria providedclinical testingNatera, Inc.Apr 23, 2020- -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpOct 20, 2022This sequence change replaces aspartic acid, which is acidic and polar, with histidine, which is basic and polar, at codon 239 of the BLM protein (p.Asp239His). This variant is present in population databases (rs200756519, gnomAD 0.02%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with BLM-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 454163). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function are either unavailable or do not agree on the potential impact of this missense change (SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Probably Damaging"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0"). In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingAmbry GeneticsJan 11, 2024The p.D239H variant (also known as c.715G>C), located in coding exon 2 of the BLM gene, results from a G to C substitution at nucleotide position 715. The aspartic acid at codon 239 is replaced by histidine, an amino acid with similar properties. In one study, this alteration was identified in a Caucasian patient with early-onset colorectal cancer (DeRycke MS et al. Mol Genet Genomic Med, 2017 Sep;5:553-569). This amino acid position is well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, this alteration is predicted to be tolerated by in silico analysis. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -
Hereditary breast ovarian cancer syndrome Uncertain:1
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterresearchCancer Genomics Group, Japanese Foundation For Cancer ResearchMay 01, 2019- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.15
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.25
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.30
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Uncertain
0.99
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.22
T;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.11
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.21
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.67
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.82
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
0.072
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.12
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.93
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.4
M;.
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
0.45
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-2.1
N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.14
Sift
Uncertain
0.0070
D;D
Sift4G
Uncertain
0.054
T;D
Polyphen
1.0
D;.
Vest4
0.33
MVP
0.86
MPC
0.48
ClinPred
0.53
D
GERP RS
3.6
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Varity_R
0.12
gMVP
0.20

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs200756519; hg19: chr15-91293213; COSMIC: COSV61922680; COSMIC: COSV61922680; API