chr15-94298443-G-A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001385001.1(MCTP2):c.178G>A(p.Ala60Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00101 in 1,614,148 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 22 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001385001.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCTP2 | NM_001385001.1 | c.178G>A | p.Ala60Thr | missense_variant | 2/23 | ENST00000357742.10 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MCTP2 | ENST00000357742.10 | c.178G>A | p.Ala60Thr | missense_variant | 2/23 | 1 | NM_001385001.1 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00527 AC: 802AN: 152182Hom.: 11 Cov.: 31
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00127 AC: 319AN: 251024Hom.: 5 AF XY: 0.000907 AC XY: 123AN XY: 135668
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000563 AC: 823AN: 1461848Hom.: 11 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000492 AC XY: 358AN XY: 727232
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00526 AC: 801AN: 152300Hom.: 11 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00507 AC XY: 378AN XY: 74488
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
MCTP2-related disorder Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences | Feb 21, 2019 | This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). - |
not provided Benign:1
Benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Invitae | Dec 31, 2019 | - - |
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at