chr16-1494475-G-C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points: 2P and 3B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6

The NM_016111.4(TELO2):ā€‹c.194G>Cā€‹(p.Cys65Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000391 in 1,613,250 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.000039 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes š‘“: 0.000039 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

TELO2
NM_016111.4 missense

Scores

1
18

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:2B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.04
Variant links:
Genes affected
TELO2 (HGNC:29099): (telomere maintenance 2) This gene encodes a protein that functions as an S-phase checkpoint protein in the cell cycle. The protein may also play a role in DNA repair.[provided by RefSeq, Mar 2009]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -1 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.110313475).
BP6
Variant 16-1494475-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-1494475-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 392873.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=1, Uncertain_significance=2}.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons MANE Protein UniProt
TELO2NM_016111.4 linkuse as main transcriptc.194G>C p.Cys65Ser missense_variant 2/21 ENST00000262319.11 NP_057195.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect #exon/exons TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TELO2ENST00000262319.11 linkuse as main transcriptc.194G>C p.Cys65Ser missense_variant 2/211 NM_016111.4 ENSP00000262319 P1
TELO2ENST00000497339.6 linkuse as main transcriptc.194G>C p.Cys65Ser missense_variant, NMD_transcript_variant 2/125 ENSP00000456383

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000394
AC:
6
AN:
152128
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.0000678
AC:
17
AN:
250714
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000516
AC XY:
7
AN XY:
135602
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000145
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000199
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000794
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000163
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000390
AC:
57
AN:
1461122
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000316
AC XY:
23
AN XY:
726880
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000896
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000201
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.0000207
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000331
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000394
AC:
6
AN:
152128
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000673
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
74308
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000483
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000294
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.000478
Alfa
AF:
0.0000903
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000680
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.000116
AC:
1
ExAC
AF:
0.0000247
AC:
3
EpiCase
AF:
0.00
EpiControl
AF:
0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:2Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingGeneDxJan 23, 2017The C65S variant in the TELO2 gene has not been reported previously as a pathogenic variant, nor as a benign variant, to our knowledge. This variant was not observed at any significant frequency in approximately 6500 individuals of European and African American ancestry in the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project, indicating it is not a common benign variant in these populations. The C65S variant is a non-conservative amino acid substitution, which is likely to impact secondary protein structure as these residues differ in polarity, charge, size and/or other properties. This substitution occurs at a position that is not conserved. In silico analysis predicts this variant likely does not alter the protein structure/function. We interpret C65S as a variant of uncertain significance. -
Uncertain significance, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testingLabcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), LabcorpNov 25, 2021This sequence change replaces cysteine, which is neutral and slightly polar, with serine, which is neutral and polar, at codon 65 of the TELO2 protein (p.Cys65Ser). This variant is present in population databases (rs141008024, gnomAD 0.02%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with TELO2-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 392873). Algorithms developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function output the following: SIFT: "Tolerated"; PolyPhen-2: "Benign"; Align-GVGD: "Class C0". The serine amino acid residue is found in multiple mammalian species, which suggests that this missense change does not adversely affect protein function. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -
TELO2-related intellectual disability-neurodevelopmental disorder Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitterclinical testing3billionSep 20, 2024The homozygous variant was found in patients diagnosed with another variant in a different gene, with no symptoms related to the gene containing the homozygous variant. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.21
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.16
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.25
CADD
Benign
15
DANN
Benign
0.49
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.093
T
Eigen
Benign
-0.70
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.72
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.35
N
LIST_S2
Benign
0.51
T
M_CAP
Benign
0.026
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.11
T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.76
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.8
L
MutationTaster
Benign
1.0
N
PrimateAI
Uncertain
0.49
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-1.8
N
REVEL
Benign
0.28
Sift
Benign
0.29
T
Sift4G
Benign
0.31
T
Polyphen
0.031
B
Vest4
0.14
MutPred
0.59
Gain of disorder (P = 0.0045);
MVP
0.73
MPC
0.15
ClinPred
0.048
T
GERP RS
3.7
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.14
gMVP
0.22

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.040
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs141008024; hg19: chr16-1544476; API