chr16-5028043-G-C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points: 2P and 6B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6_Moderate
The NM_016256.4(NAGPA):c.1063C>G(p.Pro355Ala) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant was absent in control chromosomes in GnomAD project. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★).
Frequency
Genomes: not found (cov: 32)
Consequence
NAGPA
NM_016256.4 missense
NM_016256.4 missense
Scores
19
Clinical Significance
Conservation
PhyloP100: -0.0130
Genes affected
NAGPA (HGNC:17378): (N-acetylglucosamine-1-phosphodiester alpha-N-acetylglucosaminidase) Hydrolases are transported to lysosomes after binding to mannose 6-phosphate receptors in the trans-Golgi network. This gene encodes the enzyme that catalyzes the second step in the formation of the mannose 6-phosphate recognition marker on lysosomal hydrolases. Commonly known as 'uncovering enzyme' or UCE, this enzyme removes N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (GlcNAc) residues from GlcNAc-alpha-P-mannose moieties and thereby produces the recognition marker. The encoded preproprotein is proteolytically processed by furin to generate the mature enzyme, a homotetramer of two disulfide-linked homodimers. Mutations in this gene are associated with developmental stuttering in human patients. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification made for transcript
Verdict is Likely_benign. Variant got -4 ACMG points.
PM2
?
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
?
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.052350312).
BP6
?
Variant 16-5028043-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-5028043-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 2480452.Status of the report is criteria_provided_single_submitter, 1 stars.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | MANE | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAGPA | NM_016256.4 | c.1063C>G | p.Pro355Ala | missense_variant | 6/10 | ENST00000312251.8 |
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | #exon/exons | TSL | MANE | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAGPA | ENST00000312251.8 | c.1063C>G | p.Pro355Ala | missense_variant | 6/10 | 1 | NM_016256.4 | P1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes ? Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 genomes
?
Cov.:
32
GnomAD4 exome Cov.: 36
GnomAD4 exome
Cov.:
36
GnomAD4 genome ? Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 genome
?
Cov.:
32
Bravo
AF:
ClinVar
Significance: Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:1
Likely benign, criteria provided, single submitter | clinical testing | Ambry Genetics | Feb 01, 2023 | This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. - |
Computational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
Cadd
Benign
Dann
Benign
DEOGEN2
Benign
T;.
Eigen
Benign
Eigen_PC
Benign
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
N
LIST_S2
Benign
T;T
M_CAP
Benign
T
MetaRNN
Benign
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
N;N
MutationTaster
Benign
N;N
PrimateAI
Benign
T
PROVEAN
Benign
N;N
REVEL
Benign
Sift
Benign
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
T;T
Polyphen
B;.
Vest4
MutPred
Loss of disorder (P = 0.1542);Loss of disorder (P = 0.1542);
MVP
MPC
ClinPred
T
GERP RS
RBP_binding_hub_radar
RBP_regulation_power_radar
Varity_R
gMVP
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at